MY Ultimate Summation

Would you rather beLIEve something to be true?

OR, would you rather KNOW it to be true?

Knowing, or believing? That is the choice. A True and Pure Logic question just like True/False, except in this case, it is Know/BeLIEve. Thus, since it is a True Pure Logic question, why ask stupid question I choose Know. I would rather KNOW something to be true rather than ever beLIEve something to be true. Especially without proof. Always remember the Eleven Razors (nt).

Now the Religitards would love to point out the word KNOW has kNOw within. I have defined this as, “Knowledge already questioning ITs self.” THAT is the essence of Science. It questions its self. T…H…I…N…K…

Now compared to what religion does, which is the more plausible?

Which one is more apt to have the correct answer?

Science, which even questions ITs self; or, religion, which commands AND demands compliance?

Science which continues to delve into the Unknown, or Religion that makes the Unknown a terrifying demon?

Science which shows this universe, cosmos, whatever, to be a completely knowable thing? Or, Religion which terrifies with spooks and demons? Lies and “Prevarications Made BeLIEvable”?

The Ultimate Question: Which is more plausible?

Science with Mountains of OHEFE? OR, Religion with none?

AFAIAC: Only one question needed: “Where is your OHEFE?”

…

For without proof, is IT not just a made up story?

A make-beLIEve fantasy?

A LIE?

T…H…I…N…K…! For once.

There is only ONE reason I despise Religion: IT LIES! And, misinforms with evil intent. Propogandizes its self. It has no truth except that which IT creates within infintesimally small miscreant minds. Think.

And I still cannot believe the numbers of fools that beLIEve them. The above is blood red text with a slight text-shadow.

And do not forget to check out my YouTubes (replaces this page). A small fraction at least.

— The Unknown Atheist

Top of page