Questions for oneness/ unitarians

NOTE: I sent an EPUB file to Matt Slick. After reading it, carm.org mirrored their WWW site, and deleted a mess load of other documents. Especially, his questionnaires. I confronted him about being the COWARD that Matt Slick truly is.

Following is a list of questions for oneness people who want to debate Matt Slick. They are for clarification before a debate can occur to more accurately determine the position of the oneness person before the debate. Unfortunately, a lack of clarity means that I must spend time clarifying my opponent’s position during a discussion. Essentially, this is a waste of time. Furthermore, I will take their debate challenges more seriously.

Besides, IF you cannot defend your faith at the “drop of a gauntlet”, perhaps you should not have that faith. As said, EVERYONE knows the only reason you have these screening questionnaires is to hopefully find someone whom may be stupider and more retarded than you are. These questionnaires are also to give you time to figure a method of refutation through disparagement. If you cannot defend your faith, you should give it up and go with science. I can defend my “beliefs” at any time, place, whatever. If you cannot do the same with your faith, it ain’t worth keeping. And ain’t worth much losing either.

Quoting the Questions for Response

If you want to reproduce these questions with your answers and place them on your website, you have my permission under either of the following two conditions.

This coding is because search engines will penalize both articles (yours and mine) in organic searches if the same information occurs on both sites without the proper documentation. You can, of course, quote segments of it with the blockquote tag. If you answer the questions, please send them (email no longer available) with a statement declaring that I may or may not reproduce your answers and publish them on CARM for a possible response.

I could care less about any form of penalization in searches. If I put this on the WWW, searches may find my WWW page instead of carm.org. That is my purposeful intention. You cannot stop me. AND, if I wish to use the same metatag keywords as your WWW site, I can. And shall.

Answering the questions does not guarantee that I will debate you.

Of course not. We all know you are a coward, else why the SCREENING questionnaires? If you cannot defend your lies on-the-spot, against valid, justified, substantiated questions or arguments, regardless of the person’s beliefs or lack of, then why believe such Horse Hoowhee, Bullshit, Brain Diarrhea?

If we debate, you must use your real name or no debate. TrueName already given.

You can answer by saying “Affirm”, “Deny”, “Not applicable”, or provide a brief explanation.

Updated on 11/15/2021, improved punctuation, sentence structure, and removed two redundant questions about Heysoos.

Then I had to do further spelling, puncuation, and grammer errors out the arse. Matt, go back to school and learn. Or get an editor.

Updated on 9/2/2021, added questions to the “Sin and Salvation” section.

Updated on 3/14/2022, added some questions.

ADDENDA: WOW! Someone at carm.org does not understand nor comprehend HTML. What a clusterfuck that arsehole made of this page. No coding experience at all. It took me four hours to track down all the fuck-ups s/he made.

Questions for oneness/ unitarians

Personhood, still undefined

Do you agree or disagree that person/personhood includes self-awareness, awareness of others, speaking, thinking, having a will, memory, can say “you” and “me,” etc.?
- ????? Personhood? Abstract concepts NEVER have personhood.
If you disagree with the previous question, can you explain what personhood is?
- Personhood = “being a person”. There is no other definition. Since y’awl have yet to prove your God-Things exist, questions about its “personhood” are entirely moot (useless).
Does the biblical God possess personhood?
- No. IT is just fignations of imagiments penned to paper.

God

How do you define God as it relates to your oneness/unitarian position?
- It does not.
Though you disagree with the Trinity, does the Trinity doctrine teach that there are three gods?
- Yes.
Though you disagree with the Trinity, does the Trinity doctrine teach that there are three persons in one person?
- No.
Though you disagree with the Trinity, does the Trinity doctrine teach that there are three distinct and simultaneous persons in one God?
- No.
If you know, what is the systematic approach the Trinitarians use to conclude the Trinity doctrine?
- Mental Retardation brought on by Frontotemporal Lobar Degenerative Disorder.
What verse or verses do you believe refute the doctrine of the Trinity?
- Science refutes it.
Was God in the mode/form of God in the Old Testament?
- ?????
Was God in the mode/form of Heysoos in the New Testament?
- Never existed.
Is God now in the mode/form of the Holy Spirit?
- Never existed.
What is the name of God (With Scripture references)
- “JEALOUS”. Exodus 34:14, “...for doG, whose name is “Jealous”, is a jealous God.” This IS the ONLY place in the bible where your God-thing gave ITs actual name. Otherwise, it just asserts I AM WHO AM, which ANY person can claim. Why does religion attract the unintellectual? The unknowledgeable? The stupid? The mentally retarded?

HEYSOOS

Since the Lich Heysoos has never been proven to exist, except in writing, that makes Lysantra real. Correct? I have her written down, just like your God-thing, that means she exists in Reality. Correct? Because that is exactly what you are saying. Frodo LIVES! This is my answer to questions about the Lich Heysoos, and anything you Religitards claimed IT did.

When Heysoos was walking on the earth 2000 years ago, was he a person?
When Heysoos was walking on the earth 2000 years ago, did he have two natures: divine and human?
When Heysoos was walking on the earth 2000 years ago, did he have one nature? If, was it human or divine?
When Heysoos was walking on the earth 2000 years ago, did he speak as one person or two persons?
If you affirm that Heysoos had two natures, did Heysoos” human nature ever speak while the divine nature was not speaking? If so, where in Scripture?
If you affirm that Heysoos had two natures, did Heysoos” divine nature ever speak while the human nature was not speaking? If so, where in Scripture?
When Heysoos was walking on the earth 2000 years ago, was He indwelt by God the Father?
Does Heysoos presently have two natures: divine and human?
Is Heysoos a man right now?
Does Heysoos exist right now as a person?
If you affirm that Heysoos exists right now as a person, does he possess both divine and human natures?
If you affirm that presently Heysoos has one nature, which nature is it, human or divine?
If you deny that Heysoos exists right now as a person, can you please clarify what happened to Him such that His personhood disappeared?
Is Heysoos presently the same person as the Father?
If Heysoos is not presently the same person as the Father, then who is He in relation to the Father?
Is Heysoos presently the same person as the Holy Spirit?
Who was Heysoos praying to in the Garden in Luke 22:42?
At Heysoos” baptism, when the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit were all present, were they all the same person?
At the return of Christ, is it Heysoos who returns?
If it is Heysoos who returns, that is Heysoos existing right now, is He a person in heaven?

ATONEMENT

See my above paragraph under the Lich Heysoos above.

Did God the Father indwell the body of Heysoos on the cross?
Did God the Father leave the body of Heysoos before Heysoos” death on the cross?
If you affirm that only the human nature/side of Heysoos died on the cross, then how is the sacrifice of divine value?

SIN and SALVATION

Since you Religitards have NEVER substantiated your God-thing exists, there is no such thing as sin. Except sin against YOU. T…H…I…N…K…

Do you agree or disagree that salvation is being delivered from the righteous judgment of God?
Do you agree or disagree that salvation includes being forgiven of all of our sins?
Do you agree or disagree that justification is being declared legally righteous according to the law?
Is it possible to lose one”s salvation?
If it is possible to lose one”s salvation, then what must a person do to lose it?
If it is possible to lose one”s salvation, then what must a person do to keep it?
If it is possible to lose one”s salvation, then is it possible to regain it?
If it is possible to regain one”s salvation, then what must a person do to regain it?
Is water baptism by immersion necessary for salvation?
Is water baptism by immersion with the formula of “In Heysoos” name” necessary for salvation?
If water baptism is not necessary for salvation, then what is necessary?
Would you please list out what a person must do to have his sins forgiven and be saved?
Heysoos equated sin with legal debt. Do you agree or disagree that sin is, among other things, a legal debt?
Do you agree or disagree that Heysoos canceled the sin debt at the cross?
If you disagree that Heysoos canceled the sin debt at the cross, then what was canceled/blotted out?
If you disagree that Heysoos canceled the sin debt at the cross, then when is our sin canceled?
Do you agree or disagree that we are justified by faith?
Do you agree or disagree that God grants us faith?
Do you agree or disagree that when we have faith, we are justified?

SCRIPTURES

DELETED. The bible is claims, not evidence. Thus, it is inadmissable. That is not how debate works. You must substantiate your point-of-view. Else you are a buffoon. To be laughed at. Scorned.

Since you Religitards have NEVER substantiated your God-thing exists, there is no such thing as sin. Except sin against YOU. T…H…I…N…K…

MY Turn

Writings 2Ka+ old have NO relevancy to today’s current civilization. Religion no longer has any place in today’s civilized society. Everyone knows it is lies, unless they ARE mentally retarded. Why else the creeping and increasing decline in church attendance? Sure. You could say, “But we took in 200 new members.”, neglecting to include the 600 you lost. Religion is all lies. Reigion is doomed to die. The only truth in it is what we Humans learned on our own. We did it with 200Ka of tribalism, safety in numbers, socialization. It almost becomes genetic. But alas. We ain’t got such. Homo neanderthalensis is perhaps the LAST human species to be born with genetic memories. They only need reminding. Literally.

Thus, sorry. There ain’t no imprintation from your God-thing on any person’s heart, Heart, Soul, DNA, whatthefuckever, of anything to do with your God-thing. It all happened through Natural Processes.

And all that crap you wrote on those questions you thunked. Proof of mental retardation. You are Religitard. Worth less than septic tank flotsam.

— The Unknown Atheist

Top of page