Questionnaire for Conditionalists and Nihilists

NOTE: I sent an EPUB file to Matt Slick. After reading it, carm.org mirrored their WWW site, and deleted a mess load of other documents. Especially, his questionnaires. I confronted him about being the COWARD that Matt Slick truly is.

Hey, stupid, it is Nihilism. NOT annihilism. Now I have to correct this pile of garbage. Thanks Matt for creating this pile of shit. Go to back to school and learn how to read, speak, write English. God-damn.

Following is a list of 50 questions for conditionalists, nihilationists. They are for clarification since a lot of their writings are not clear on specific issues.

If anyone wishes to debate me about nihilism, you must answer all of the following questions. So you can be the coward you are and choose ONLY those you have a chance of defeating. COWARD.

Otherwise, I will not debate you. But, answering all the questions does not commit me to a debate.

If anyone writes a “refutation” of any of my articles on conditionalism, would you be so kind as to answer the following questions? This is because if I respond to your attempt at refutation, I will understand what perspective you have within nihilism, so I can better respond. Liar. This is a screening tool. Not one for knowledge. Quit lying. After all, different conditionalists have different views. I’ve found that much of conditionalist writings are not clear in some of the issues that need to be addressed. That is only because you lack the intellectualism to comprehend anything. Therefore, the following list of questions. They deal a lot with the nature of the human soul. So, for simplicity, I define the soul as that part of our non-physical being that animates our bodies, the life principle, contains our self-awareness, is our mind, etc. Please add any comments that you think are necessary for clarification.

I deleted this whole section because I do not give a flying fuck about your bullshit about what I can or cannot quote and how I must do such quotes. I provide a link back to your WWW site. That is all the attribution I have to give. I do NOT have to legally do your search metatag BULLSHIT. If someone searches carm.org and are directed to my WWW page or Ebook, good. They sure as hell do not need to read your retarded brain diarrhea. I shall also make ANY edits to the HTML that I want also. There is nothing legally you can do against me. Go ahead and try. In fact, I demand you to try.

GOD AND TRINITY

Do you affirm or deny that there is only one eternal God-thing in all existence, all time, and in all places?
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny that the christinsane God-thing is the one and only, necessary, Trinitarian Being who consists of three eternal, distinct, and simultaneous persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny that the christinsane God-thing consists of one person who manifested in different forms?
- Deny.
If you deny the christinsane Trinity view of christinsane God-thing, what view of a God-thing do you hold?
- IT NEVER EXISTED.
Do you affirm or deny that the Trinitarian God, is timeless?
- Deny.
If you affirm that the God-thing is timeless, can you explain what it means for God-thing to be timeless – with Scripture, if possible?
- IT does NOT exist. Thus, ain’t timeless.

HEYSOOS’s NATURE

Do you affirm or deny that the second person of the God-thing, the Word, became flesh in the single person of Heysoos?
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny that the single person of Heysoos, according to Scripture, exhibited attributes of self-awareness, awareness of others, could reason, speak, think, etc., thereby demonstrating the attributes of personhood.
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny the doctrine of the hypostatic union, which states that the one person of Heysoos presently has two distinct and simultaneous natures, the divine and the human?
- Deny. Besides, you are using the word hypostatic incorrectly. Typical of Religitards not knowing the language.
Do you affirm or deny the doctrine of the communicatio idiomatum, which states that the attributes of both natures of Heysoos (human and divine) are ascribed to the single person of Heysoos?
- Deny.

HUMAN NATURE AND DEATH

Do you affirm or deny that a human person is a single unity that cannot be broken into physical and spiritual parts?
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny physicalism (not an actual word) regarding human nature? Physicalism meaning the idea that the physical brain produces the mind, that the mind is a function of the physical brain.
- WTF is physicalism?
Do you affirm or deny physicalism regarding human nature so that when the physical brain dies physically, the human soul ceases to exist?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
Do you affirm or deny physicalism regarding human nature so that when the physical brain dies, the human mind/soul continues to exist in a state of consciousness?
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny physicalism regarding human nature so that when the physical brain dies, the human mind/soul continues to exist but in a state of unconsciousness?
- Deny.
Do you affirm or deny mind/body dualism? Mind-Body dualism meaning: that the soul is different than the physical brain and that upon the death of the person, the soul continues to exist apart from the death of the physical brain.
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
Do you affirm or deny soul sleep? Soul-Sleep meaning: that the human soul continues to exist after the person’s physical death but is unconscious and inactive.
- Damn. The Brain Diarrhea is running deep.
Do you affirm or deny that upon a person’s physical death, his soul (spirit) returns to that God-thing?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
Do you affirm or deny that upon death, if the soul (spirit) returns that God-thing, that the human person ceases to exist?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
Do you affirm or deny that upon death, if the soul (spirit) returns taht God-thing, does that mean the person has lost his personal identity?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
Do you affirm or deny that upon death, if the soul (spirit) returns that God-thing, that it means the soul is part of God-thing’s personhood?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
Do you affirm or deny that upon death, if the soul (spirit) returns that God-thing, that it means the soul is distinct from God-thing’s personhood?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
If your position is that upon the person’s death, only the physical nature, including the soul, ceases to exist, then is it re-created upon his resurrection?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.
If your position is that upon the person’s death, only the physical nature, including the soul, ceases to exist, and that he is re-created by that God-thing, then how is the continuity of the person maintained?
- MUST first prove the soul-thingy. Else this question is moot.

DEATH OF HEYSOOS – WHOLE PERSON

You cannot prove the Lich Heysoos ever existed. Thus, any questions are moot. Unaswerable.

Do you affirm or deny that the phrase “whole person of Heysoos” means that in the one person of Heysoos are two distinct natures, the divine and human? (This is called the hypostatic union)
Do you affirm or deny that the phrase “whole person of Heysoos” means that the attributes of both his divine and human natures were ascribed to, and claimed by, the single person of Heysoos? (This is called the Communicatio Idiomatum)
Do you affirm or deny that the whole person of Heysoos died on the cross?
Do you affirm or deny that if the whole person of Heysoos died on the cross, that it means both his natures died on the cross?

DEATH OF HEYSOOS – HUMAN NATURE ONLY

You cannot prove the Lich Heysoos ever existed. Thus, any questions are moot. Unaswerable.

Do you affirm or deny that only the human nature of Heysoos died on the cross?
If only the human nature of Heysoos died on the cross, then how is the sacrifice of Heysoos of divine value?
Do you affirm or deny that between the death of Heysoos and his physical resurrection, his human nature ceased to exist?
Do you affirm or deny that only the human nature of Heysoos died on the cross and also ceased to exist, then was it re-created upon his resurrection?
If your position is that upon the death of Heysoos, only the human nature ceased to exist, can you please explain how the hypostatic union of Heysoos is maintained?
Do you affirm or deny that between the death of Heysoos and his physical resurrection, his human nature continued to exist but was in a state of unconscious soul sleep?
Do you affirm or deny that between the death of Heysoos and his physical resurrection, his human nature continued to exist and was conscious and active?

DEATH OF HEYSOOS – DIVINE NATURE

You cannot prove the Lich Heysoos ever existed. Thus, any questions are moot. Unaswerable.

Do you affirm or deny that at the death of Heysoos, his divine nature ceased to exist?
If you deny that both the divine and human natures ceased to exist in his physical death, then can you please explain what happened to each of Heysoos’ natures upon his physical death on the cross?

JUDGMENT AND PUNISHMENT

Since there is no such thing as an “after-death” realm, there is no justice and/or punishment after a person dies. As said, you MUST first prove the soul-thingy exists. Otherwise, all questions are moot.

Do you affirm or deny that an unbeliever ceases to exist after his physical death, and his soul is resurrected to be judged to nihilism?
Do you affirm or deny that when a person dies and ceases to exist, and his soul is later resurrected to be judged to eternal life or extinction, that the continuity of the person is disrupted? Continuity meaning: the existence of the essence of something continues and is uninterrupted.
Do you affirm or deny that when a person dies and ceases to exist, and his soul is later resurrected to be judged to eternal life or extinction, that the continuity of the person is not disrupted?
Do you affirm or deny that upon the death of an unbeliever, he is automatically and permanently nihilated?
Do you affirm or deny that an unbeliever will undergo a time of conscious punishment that corresponds to his sin before his nihilism?
Do you affirm or deny that the state of non-existence is the final punishment for unbelievers?
Do you affirm or deny that the unbeliever continues to exist in a conscious state after physical death and that he is undergoing punishment during that time?
Do you affirm or deny that an unbeliever, in a state of soul sleep, is not undergoing punishment?
Do you affirm or deny that an unbeliever, in a state of soul sleep, will be awakened.
Do you affirm or deny that the only way a person can be conscious is when he is united with his living, physical body?

ANGELIC REALM

Until an angelic realm is proven, any questions are moot. Unanswerable.

Do you affirm or deny that good angels will continue to exist forever?
Do you affirm or deny that the wicked angels will be nihilated?
Do you affirm or deny that the devil will be judged and condemned to conscious, eternal punishment without end?

Thank you for considering these questions for conditionalists, nihilists. If you hold that position, perhaps the questions got you to think.

And guess what? Since I wrote answers to your questions, your questions now become my Copyright material. Did not know that did you? >:-P

As for what you do with me answers, I could care less. This copy was put into the public before yours. And then all that damned rewriting what you wrote because you do not know American English. Go back to school.

— The Unknown Atheist

Top of page