Problems With Philosophy and Philosophiæ

AFAIAC: There is a HUGE difference between the two. Here is a quick, simple difference. Philosophy only needs emotions and no intelligence. Philosophiæ requires critical thinking and advanced knowledge.

The first and foremost fact of philosophy reminds me of an ancient idiom: Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one. Thus, is the way of philosophies also.

Every person alive right now has their own philosophy. And that is where the problems come from.

The major problem with the Religitards use of Philosophical Logic proves NOTHING. The only thing philosophy proves is that you have an imagination. In the case of Religitards, a completely wicked and evil imagination, but still an imagination.

Philosophical Logic, or just Philosophy, used by the Religitards only proves two things:

 

  1. You can speak truthfulness.
  2. You can fabricate prevarications.

That philosophical BSBD used by Religitards PROVES nothing. Now here is where my definition of Nothing is useful: Nothing is the complete absence of any physical object and anything with properties (gravity, radiation, weak force, etc., etc., et alia). Thus, it does not exist in our known universe, being at best an abstract concept ONLY in the mind.”

You religitards are confusing the degree Doctoral Philosophiæ with the general layperson definition of philosophy, exactly as you Religitards completely misunderstand the two different meanings for “theory” and “Theory”. And all this does is prove the stupidity of Religitards. They still have yet to grasp English. There are no Religitards capable of True philosophical thinking. Instead, they use their imagination to take True Truth and twist and pervert and corrupt and convolute and obfuscate it into believable lies that MUST use the emotions for its acceptance. Not one Religitard is capable of being able to use True Philosophiæ.

What Religitards call logical philosophical proof, is actually nothing more than their most sophisticated methods of using beguiling semantics and prestidigitative dialect to make their LIES believable, and by preying upon the emotions to prove it for them. No Religitard, especially that monster William Lane Craig (I call him Sociopathic Bill), are capable of actually thinking. Let alone being able to think critically. As I have always said, if Religitards could think critically, there would be NO Religitards. If every human would think critically, there would be no religion. T…H…I…N…K… Critically on that. Provided you can...

The idiotic philosophy utillized by the Religitards only proves one thing, provided one can see through the Prevarications made beLIEvable. It proves the Religitards have Absolutely NO evidence and must prey on your emotions to make their beguilement beLIEvable. They cannot use True Logic, True Probability, True Philosophy to prove anything of their BSBD. It is all fantasy make-beLIEve. Instead of using the intellect, they predate the 7734 out of your emotions to override your intellect. Now who are the stupid ones?

Thinking with the cerebellum; thus, with emotions only, is already fallacious and irrational before the thought is even completed. How can no one see this predation by the Religitards? I guess for only moi, it is as obvious as your nose. Religitards KNOW the Horse Hoowhee, Bullshit, and Brain Diarrhea they spew from their lips is all LIES; thus, the reason they MUST use beguiling semantics and prestidigitative dialect to make YOU use your own emotions against your INTELLECT to make the LIES they spew beLIEvable. T…H…I…N…K… on that. And, you ain’t got to think critically.

Just think on this. Comprehend that it REQUIRES beguiling semantics and pretidigitative dialect to create the beLIEvable LIES of religion, and how those Pulpit Prevaricators abuse your intellect. And if there be a God-Thing, do you honestly expect the reasoning, rationality, critical thinking, etc. that God-Thing begifted us humans with, only for us to forego their use? Paraphrased from Galileo Galilei.

Just T…H…I…N…K…

Ultimately, the philosophy the Religitards are using is not Philosophiæ. Rather it is a method of thought on how Religitards can gain control of your mind, to gain POWER for themselves, since emotions are more easily manipulated than the intellect. It is a mentality of, “How can I make this LIE beLIEvable?” True Philosophiæ is rather a method of thinking. Critical Thinking that allows you to search for the answers of the Mysteries of the Natural World. A method by which True logic, reasoning, deduction, rationality, critical thinking, imagination, invention are used in order to create a way to falsify or verify.

True Philosophiæ is rather a method of thought that literally follows the Scientific Method in order to delve out the True Truth of the Natural World. Even Peter Kreeft (ugh his surname is creepy) said, probably paraphrased badly, “Science and the Scientific Method are currently the only methods we have of learning of the world”. He also said that, “...atheists tend to be more intellligent, more intellectual, more knowledgeable than any theists”. Perhaps because we ARE more open-minded about what we learn? What knowledge we seek and gain?

Summation

The “philosophy” the Religitards use is nothing more than a method for those Religitards to control the masses and gain POWER and WEALTH above all else. Religitards care for nothing except to have their egos stroked. Religitards are the most narcissistic defecation of Humanity. It is the Religitards that ARE the criminals. 99.8% of prisoners in America ARE Religitards. 499 out of 500 prisoners. Again, if your religion is so good for Humanity, then why are virtually all prisoners Religitards?

And here is a plausible explanation as to why Atheists and Non-Religious are not criminals. Those who tend to be non-religious, also tend to be the most intellectual. The most knowledgeable. IQ exams PROVE this FACT. As a person’s intellectualism increases, the less likely they are to beLIEve Religitardism. THIS IS PROVEN FACT!

Another point, intellectualism also makes for persons who think deeply. Their curiosity overrides any criminal thoughts and behaviour. Not always true, but is provable as FACT.

Again, that plot graph:

Some true surprises in that plot graph, notice how when you get about halfway up the Religiosity axis, the Intellectualism takes a sudden dive. Just this graph comparing Intellectualism versus Religiosity should prove my point about Religitardism. It requires a mental retard to beLIEve lies as truth. As opposed to Intellectualism which requires cold, hard, unforgiving facts and evidence, and rationality, reasoning, critical thinking.

Number One FACT: If you cannot prove your claim true, it is a LIE.

Religion attracts the mentally retarded because they do NOT possess the mental facalties to determine LIES from truth. Additionally, the mentally retarded are attracted to Religitardism because it gives them all the reasons they need for being stupid. As I have said, “If Religitards could think critically, there would be no Religitards. If all humans could think critically, there would be no religion.”

Religitards seem to retain JUST enough intelligence to enable them to LIE their arses off. To create beLIEvable Prevarications. Abuse your intellect by preying upon your emotions. Religitards also KNOW this fact: They CANNOT prove their any of their God-Things through intellectualism. They KNOW this for FACT. Thus, they MUST abuse your emotions to make them override your intellect.

Need I say more about Philosophiæ versus Philosophy?

T…H…I…N…K…


About IQ exams

There are ONLY three things an IQ score tells us about you.

  1. How fast you can learn something new.
  2. How much knowledge you can store.
  3. How fast you can access that knowledge.

Nothing more. Nothing less. Now having high scores in the three above, can be indicative of genius. And here is question you may ask: What is my IQ score? I do not know. I have never known. I have never participated in taking IQ exams. Even if required by Public School systems, I purposefully made myself as if a mental retard. I shall NEVER need a fucking IQ-like test to tell me that I can think critically, think rationally, think reasoningly. Figure it out yourself. Me SoulMate had me do the Mensa Test. However, I do not know and never knew the results of that Mensa tests. I do not give damn to know. I KNOW I can think, and Religitards cannot, will not.

— The Unknown Atheist

Top of page


Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved