True logic. Not that wishy-washy Philosophical Logic Brain Diarrhea invented just for Religitards and their many, many, ...many religions (over 40,000 globally). The list of True Logic’s attributes.
True Logic does not give a damn about your wishy-washy Maybes and Buts and Howevers and Whatabouts. There ARE ONLY two answers of the types: Yes/No, True/False, On/Off, 1/0. There ARE NO tweeners, maybes, buts, or wishes. Thus, the Question: “Do you believe in a God-thing?” is considered the OLDEST False Dichotomy Dilemma Fallacy ever employed by any human. A question that also implies, you had better beLIEve, or you will be put to death. There is only one of two answers. My answer is “No. I do not believe. Rather, I know, or I know not.”
Using color, True Logic is pure Black or White. NO greyscale.
If you wish to see the most god-awful messy illogic and unitellectualism, just visit those Religitard WWW sites such as carm.org, AiG, DI, IDEA, etc., et alia.
Those principles of Philosophical Logic such as Non-Contradiction, Excluded Middle, Identity, and Proper Inference are completely and utterly useless for finding True Truth. For one thing, the Excluded Middle and Identity are the same exact thing. Exactly the same. Just worded differently. And Proper Inference is an utter failure when trying to prove anything. Thus, the reason my Mentor in college taught me, “Never, ever, use inference. It only leads to lies. Rather, use deduction. Deduction utilizes logic, reasoning, rationality, critical thinking; whereas, inference is just a wish.” Greatest definition and greatest advice from one scientist to another. One I shall never forget. Until dead.
Finally, Logic, by its very nature is already noncontradictive since there is only two possible answers: True or False. The “I-do-not-know” is just an admittance I do not possess enough knowledge of whatever to give a True/False answer. Since Logic can only be True/False, it ain’t contradictive unless purposefully LYING as the Religitards.
Perhaps the greatest example is the bacterial flagellum. Once we looked into its components on a molecular level, we were absolutely astonished. Its base DID resemble a rotary motor. But does that automatically infer design? 7734 NO! For me it proved My ICIDIC.
Drawing on the Vulcan IDIC from a Star Trek novel (forget which), I simply added an IC: Infinite Complexity from Infinite Diversity through Infinite Combinations. Thus, my question: How many times has DNA been through Life’s replication processes over the past 3½ Billion years? Or, are you a YEC? In actuality, that question is moot. We could use Numeration Theory to hazard a guess. But what is the use? Basically, since the first DNA molecule formed on Earth, it is a number so huge, why waste the effort to guess? We are talking about 3.8±0.1 Ga. BILLIONS! of years.
So... Where did you Religitards come up with the huge number: 1 chance in 101320 (largest I found on Religitard WWW sites, smallest was 1 chance in 10124); for life to even form at all? We already know the probability is 100% with sample size 1. If here now, why not earlier on other planets? What if we run into THE Droves?
A Wild Tangent
Would you believe me if I told you that computers were designed based on the human mind?
What do you do when you make a decision? You literally run a series of Yes/No questions weighing probabilities.
Again, there are NO Maybes. If you answer Maybe, you are simply foregoing the ultimate Yes/No answer. Even if other things make you completely forget, and it is too late, the answer ends up being No.
That is how computer programming first started. It allowed the computer to answer a series of Yes/No questions weighing probability. And it could do it with globs of 0s and 1s faster than humans.
From The Great Wiki: Nerve impulses are extremely slow compared to the speed of electricity, where the electric field can propagate with a speed on the order of 50–99% of the speed of light (mostly around 60% due to not all conductors being super-); however, it is very fast compared to the speed of blood flow, with some neurons conducting at speeds up to 120 m/s (432 km/h or 275 mph). And you wonder why it seems instantaneous when you stub that toe.
At most, 2m ÷ 120 m/s = 1/60th of a second. 16⅔ milliseconds. And if shorter than 2m, even quicker.
Electricity flows ≈1¼ to 2½ million times faster.
IOW: By the time our neurons can process 1 record, a computer can process about 1,500,000 records. It also depends on the frequency of the electric field.
— The Unknown Atheist
Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved