Author’s Notes

Foremost, this is an anthology of many essays in abbreviated form. And there are quite a few. I shall not be counting.

Ultimately, this treatise, paper, book, whatever is primarily about these two Religitardistic interrogative statements:

Why can you NOT beLIEve?

Why shall you NEVER beLIEve?

Thus, if you are an inexorable beLIEver, you ain’t going to enjoy this…

However, I have been a scientist for practically me entire life. I came out me mom with a brain “pre-wired” for frontotemporal lobar thinking (prefrontal cortex). I have had the brain of a scientist literally every second I have been alive. And there are others I have personally met that were also born “pre-wired”.

No Sapiens has ever been born “pre-loaded” with any knowledge.

No Sapiens has ever been born “pre-loaded” with any beLIEfs, either.

We lost that genetic memories thing when we transitioned from Neanders to Sapiens. At least that is MY Hypothesis. Anyone who wonders why the Neanders went extinct can easily see that us Sapiens had the mental advantage, though Neanders had a larger brain. That enlarged prefrontal cortex gaves us Sapiens the greatest gift of all: Invention.

WILD TANGENT: Have you ever noticed that the more intelligent the species, the more helpless its offspring? No one except me? Why? Because we lost the genetic memory. Genetic Memory relies on emotions. That startle-flee instinct is ALL emotion. No reason. No rationality. Complete emotional response. Survival instinct.

However, some exceptionally few humans are born with an larger prefrontal cortex, losing the genetic memories. Such Sapiens were probably ostracized. Many found each other, then we extincted the Neanders. Simply because the first Sapiens were geniuses compared to the Neanders. That larger prefrontal cortex gave us Sapiens the ability for critical thinking, rational thinking, reasoning, logic, deduction, imagination, invention, and most important, SANITY. Where do you think those child savants come from? You know, those 8y old children with an IQ of 180+. The brain was pre-wired. NOT pre-loaded, just pre-wired.

And such can be a tremendously horrible nightmare for such a child. I KNOW, for I lived the horror. For in America, when growing-up, intelligence is the greatest negative.

And why has no Inexorable beLIEver ever noticed that one thing about that one word?

beLIEf

beLIEfs

beLIEve

beLIEvable

…

It tells you at the get-go within the first 5 letters what they are: be LIE.

Think…

Reasonable? Levels of WHY?

You mean to tell me that you did not know that “WHY?” is the ONLY “Unanswerable Question”?

For no matter the answer you give, I can again ask, “Why?” And do so infinitely regressively. There is no ultimate answer for Why.

However, that is when I came up with, “Reasonable Levels of Why” some half century ago. For, you can answer Why to a “reasonable” level. I now use it as me main title of this treatise.

My Ultimate PoV of Religion, ALL Religions

Religion is nothing more than a childish game of,

“My IF can beat up your IF.”

With “IF” = Invisible Friend.

And for those whom still do not catch it, Invisible Friend = any damned God-Thing you wish.

Brutal? Very. Obnoxious? ONLY to Inexorable beLIEvers. Truthful? 7734, Yes!

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Why can I not believe?

To be wholly honest,

“How can I believe in anything I can demonstrably falsify?”

Once you answer that question, you may just begin to see the LIEs of Inexorable beLIEverism. Thus, I have utterly answered that religionistic question. And you Inexorable beLIEvers CANNOT refute nor debunk that answer. Because if I can demonstrably falsify a claim, why would I beLIEve IT?

And YES, a question CAN have an interrogative as an answer. But unlike Inexorable beLIEvers, my interrogative answers actually makes coherent sense, because once you answer it… Interrogative answers from Inexorable beLIEvers are not “coherent” in any sense. Most often they are childish, lacking proof, lacking evidence.

You may ask, “Where is your evidence?” My evidence lies with the fact that I can “demonstrably falsify” ANY Inexorable beLIEverism because IT has no evidence. That is my evidence for, “How can I believe in anything I can demonstrably falsify?”

Here are some definitions.

Inexorable beLIEver

Derived from the full term, “religious purposeful mental retardation”. I knew intuitively, even as a child, that Inexorable beLIEvers were mentally retarded in some form about 35 years before science proved it. I sometimes use the term “Religitard”.

Inexorable beLIEverism

Inexorable beLIEfs in any religion.

OHEEF

Objective Hard Empirical Evidence and FACTs

FACT

Formal Accurate Codified Truth

FAITH

False Assumptions, Innuendoes, and Treasonous Hypocrisy

Ultimately, belief REQUIRES a total, complete, utter suspension of the intellect. Pure mental laziness. One sign of mental retardation.

Greatest Oxymoron

I literally once had a Sunday School Teacher (greatest triple oxymoron) ask me, verbatim, “Why can’t you use the mind god gave you and just believe?”

Well, … I did use me mind. Now I am a retired scientist possessing more knowledge than ALL Inexorable beLIEvers combined. Call me atheist. Call me satanic. Call me whatever you wish to call me, but I have now become utterly ill at what you Inexorable beLIEvers have been lying about. For, that is all any Inexorable beLIEver can do: LIE his/her arse off.

I now take an active stand against ALL Inexorable beLIEverism. I have let it slide for too many decades.

If Inexorable beLIEvers could think critically, there would be no Inexorable beLIEvers.

If all Humans would think critically, there would be no religion.

Spirituality? Definitely. For Spirituality IS entirely subjective and relative to each individual person. It is when THIS becomes organized, you get the criminal thug gangs.

THINK…

— Arakish & The Unknown Atheist

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Why shall I never believe?

Until I am given irrefutable OHEEF of your God-Thing’s existence, IT does not exist. I cannot put IT any simpler. Regardless of defintion, your God-Thing SHALL leave evidence of tampering. WHERE IS THAT EVIDENCE?

No matter how you may define YOUR God-Thing, IT shall leave evidence of ITs tampering with Reality. Now, two BRUTAL questions that MUST be answered with anything “religious”.

What is ANY statement/claim/assertion NOT backed by OHEEF other than a LIE?

What is ANY otherwise intelligent person whom believes faerie tales and LIEs are truth other than “mentally retarded”?

Brutal? Exceptionally. Offensive? ONLY to Inexorable beLIEvers. And remember this: You MAY not use anything religious to answer those two questions. If you do, you automatically fail with a 0 (zero).

I may be brutal. Offensive. Obnoxious. However, when you Inexorable beLIEvers were in power, you would just burn us at the stake. Now when we refute your beLIEfs system, you cry like little babies. Tell lies. More lies. And yet more lies. And throw bigger and bigger temper tantrums. There is NEVER one word of truth in anything an Inexorable beLIEver may write/orate. Not one word of truthfulness.

From all I have read across The Great GIGO Machine about what Inexorable beLIEvers truly beLIEve, I am flabbergasted that any person can beLIEve their Word Salad, Gish Gallop, Horse Hoowhee, Bull Stinky, and Brain Diarrhea. 7734, you have the greatest fact-checking tool ever invented; provided, you KNOW how to research.

However…

I shall be the very first to admit I do not KNOW definitively that any God-Thing does NOT exist. You Inexorable beLIEvers are absolutely correct on just that one thing. And due to this FACT, I am still wide open to accept OHEEF the supernatural DOES coexist with the natural. Until then, IT… does… not… exist… Default Axiom.

THE Bestest Starting Position: “Until I have evidence and proof IT does exists, IT DOES NOT.” IOW, IT is False, until proven True.

NO OHEEF = No existence. Absence of Evidence only proves Absence of existence.

Simple. Easy peasy.

That Bull Stinky thing invented by religimorons decades ago goes something akin to, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” Horse Patties. Absence of evidence proves only one thing: Never existed.

How am I to beLIEve when you have absolutely no proof to back your empty and inconsequential claims?

Matt Dillahunty once said something like:

“A god that refuses to show itself is the same as no god at all.”

Yet, no refutes. No debunks.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

How About A Science Lesson?

Inexorable beLIEvers just abandoned this page… Good. They are too unintellectual to understand, let alone comprehend.

And THAT is my leastest hope. You may understand, even if you can not comprehend. Understanding is half the battle. The other half comes from the listener/reader. Desire to learn more. To comprehend.

Life from Lifelessness

Is it possible? Can it happen? Abiogenesis. The science of the study of the origin of life. Why do Inexorable beLIEvers connect it with Evolution? Two separate monkies. Evolution is the study of inheritable traits across generations within a population. Nothing to do with Abiogenesis. The two compliment, but not breedable fields of science. Why? Because Evolution does not come into the game until life HAS already abiogenesized.

Copy, pasted from a RPG book I am writing.

MY Definition of Life

Since a part of how planets work is the possibility of the emergence of Life (which DEFINITELY occured on your RPG world), let me define how I define Life. Thus, I did get off me lazy butt and hunted through my many Biology and Evolution textbooks. Wrote many, many, …many notes. Categorized and analyzed those notes, then settled on the below. Others (especially Official NAS definition) shall be different. I never bothered with the WWW, except above URL. But I feel all below fit into what makes Life, Life.

homeostasis – maintains autonomic functions (virtually all below are autonomic)

organization – cells, organs, a body

metabolism – intake of fuel, fuel delivery system, conversion of fuel into energy and building blocks (lipids, etc.)

growth – self-explanatory; but not all life grows in size once born

adaption – can adapt to a new clime, new environment

stimuli response – if you do not know this… then how’d you make children

replication – through processes known as asexual and bisexual reproduction. But what about trisexual reproduction à la Alien Nation, movie and series.

excretion – waste expulsion system

Most Important: is self-sustaining – can maintain all above without help

Shockingly, according to my definition above, a human baby does NOT qualify as life. It is not self-sustaining without help. However, I do not assume this. Not all life is born with genetic memories and literally self-motile within seconds to minutes of birth. Thus, the young forms would need protection in the least.

WILD TANGENT: An interesting thought I JUST had pop into to me frond. It almost seems as if the more “sapient” a species, the more defenseless and helpless the newborn. Hmm…

Virtually all eukaryotic life (excepting plants) goes through growth stages: infant, juvenile, and adult. Well... I should say I define three growth stages as defined. Actually, plants can be categorized as seedling, sapling, … Wild Tangent, see below.

Then adult could be subdivided into young, mature, old. In a list:

infant

juvenile

adult

young

mature

old

And for plants (Wild Tangent above):

seedling

sapling

plantal

young – just beginning to flower and starting fruit

mature – well-established and producing much fruit

old – ending production and either dies (annual) or goes dormant (perennials)

I do not list any age ranges for animals above since this is based upon physiology, not mental.

Plants are the exception. As long as a plant lives, it also grows in size and maturity, until killed, or dies. All other life does NOT. Some plants capable of living millennia.

WILD TANGENT: If there ever were an “explosion” of Life, it would have actually been during the Carboniferous period. Think. A true explosion of life diversifying with a vengeance to produce all that coal, oil, etc. It was on overdrive. Carboniferous was 358.9±0.4Ma to 289.9±0.15Ma BP. A period of 69Ma. All that coal and oil laid down in just 70 million years! There is the true “Cambrian” explosion. Did I not say the Cambrian Explosion was no explosion at all?

Most Common Elements in the Milky Way Galaxy

Z | Element | Mass fraction (ppm)
1 | Hydrogen | 739,000
2 | Helium | 240,000
8 | Oxygen | 10,400
6 | Carbon | 4600
10 | Neon | 1340
26 | Iron | 1090
7 | Nitrogen | 960
14 | Silicon | 650
12 | Magnesium | 580
16 | Sulfur | 440

Z = shorthand for “Atomic Number”. Also, number of protons.

Additionally, excepting Helium and Neon, all others are required for life.

Most Common Elements in Earth’s Crust

Z | Element | Symbol | Abundance (ppm)
8 | oxygen* | O | 461,000 (46.1%)
14 | silicon | Si | 282,000 (28.2%)
13 | aluminium | Al | 82,300 (8.23%)
26 | iron* | Fe | 56,300 (5.63%)
20 | calcium | Ca | 41,500 (4.15%)
11 | sodium | Na | 23,600 (2.36%)
12 | magnesium | Mg | 23,300 (2.33%)
19 | potassium | K | 20,900 (2.09%)
22 | titanium | Ti | 5,650 (0.565%)
1 | hydrogen* | H | 1,400 (0.14%)
15 | phosphorus | P | 1,050 (0.105%)
25 | manganese | Mn | 950 (0.095%)
9 | fluorine | F | 585 (0.0585%)
56 | barium | Ba | 425 (0.0425%)
38 | strontium | Sr | 370 (0.037%)
16 | sulfur* | S | 350 (0.035%)
6 | carbon* | C | 200 (0.02%)
* - Also most common in Milky Galaxy

Z = shorthand for “Atomic Number”. Also, number of protons. Funny how oxygen is the most common lithographic element. Silicon dioxide is quartz. That is where most of the oxygen comes from. A gas, but dissolved in solids.

The two most common elements in the Earth’s crust, oxygen and silicon, are the sand you walk on in the form of silicon dioxide (SiO₂).

Most Common Elements in Humans

Element
% mass
% atoms

Oxygen*
65.0
24.0

Carbon*
18.5
12.0

Hydrogen*
9.5
62.0

Nitrogen*
2.6
1.1

Calcium
1.3
0.22

Phosphorus
0.6
0.22

Sulfur*
0.3
0.038

Potassium
0.2
0.03

Sodium
0.2
0.037

Chlorine
0.2
0.024

Magnesium*
0.1
0.015

* – Also in Most Common Elements in Milky Way.
What the 7734 do we use sulfur for?

About 99% of the mass of the human body is made up of six elements (orange shaded above): oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus.

Only about 0.85% is composed of another five elements: potassium, sulfur, sodium, chlorine, and magnesium.

All eleven are necessary for life.

The remaining elements are trace elements, of which more than a dozen are thought, on the basis of good evidence, to be necessary for life.

All of the mass of the trace elements put together (less than 10 grams for a 100kg human body) do not add up to the body’s mass of magnesium, the least common of the 11 non-trace elements.

What in 7734 do we use sulfur for?

From this Great Wiki page, then others.

Found this using AiseArcher:

Sulfur is essential for various bodily functions, including protein synthesis, detoxification, and the production of important amino acids.

Key Functions of Sulfur

Protein Synthesis: Sulfur is crucial for the production of amino acids, particularly cysteine and methionine, which are the building blocks of proteins. These proteins are vital for the formation of cells, tissues, and hormones in the body.

Detoxification: Sulfur plays a significant role in detoxifying the body by helping to process medications, food additives, and toxic metals. It aids in the safe digestion of these substances, contributing to overall health.

Antioxidant Production: Sulfur is involved in the synthesis of glutathione, a powerful antioxidant that protects cells from damage caused by free radicals and supports the immune system.

Collagen Production: Sulfur is essential for the synthesis of collagen, which provides structure and strength to skin, hair, and nails. This makes sulfur important for maintaining healthy skin and preventing signs of aging.

Insulin Production: Sulfur is a component in the production of insulin, the hormone that regulates blood sugar levels, thus playing a role in energy metabolism.

Most Common Compound in the Milky Way Galaxy

Remember, a compound is composed of two or more elements. The most common compound found in the universe is

Water.

Plain old dihydrogen monoxide. Classified as the “most universal” solvent. Now you know a reasonable level of Why for it being named “most universal” solvent. 7734, it IS the most common compound and the most common solvent. We have even detected “organic compounds” in some of those stellar nurseries.

Now answer: Would you agree that all elements/compounds listed above ARE lifeless?

But when brought together…

Primordial Earth Hadean Into Archaeon Periods

Can you imagine what the Earth was like during its initial protoplanet phase? When Earth accumulated, all those chunks of rock impacted with tremendous energy becoming power converted into heat. The Earth was a literal ball of magma during the Heavy Bombardment Accumulation Period (HBAP). What was in that magma? H, He, Li, Be, B, C, N, O, F, Ne, all the way up to Fe and Ni. With all that molten magma mixing around, many compounds were formed. The gases were blown out, giving Earth a highly toxic atmosphere. The denser stuff, like FeNi, sank to the core.

Most Common Gaseous Compounds Emitted by Volcanoes

Using the Principle of Uniformitarianism, “The forces working to change the Earth of today are the same forces that worked billions of years ago.”, the same gases emitted by volcanoes today, were the same during the Hadean into Archaeon Periods 4 billion years ago.

water vapor (H₂O; ≅ 60-70%)

carbon dioxide (CO₂; ≅ 20-30%)

Water vapor and carbon dioxide combine to be 80-95% of gases emitted by volcano.

sulfur either as

sulfur dioxide (SO₂), or

hydrogen sulfide (H₂S)

diatomic nitrogen (N₂)

argon (Ar)

helium (He)

neon (Ne)

methane (CH₄)

carbon monoxide (CO)

hydrogen as

hydrogen chloride (HCl),

hydrogen fluoride (HF),

hydrogen bromide (HBr), and

hydrogen cyanide (HCN)

sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆)

carbonyl sulfides (OCSs; precusor to hydrocarbons)

⇒ organic compounds ⇐

Organic Compounds?!  WTH?

Basically, the Earth has a severe case of flatulence, and 4 billion years later us humans of today.

We were farted into existence. ;-P

All those gases mixing in a tumultuous atmosphere. If you take away water vapour, you are left with gases that easily and readily combine with water vapour. You end up with clouds full of acids.

Author’s Note: When I use the word “eventually”, I am refering to loonngg periods of time. Ma.

Eventually, the Earth cooled enough for rains to fall. Acid rains that make today’s acid rains laughable. That acidic rain hits the hot Earth, returning some water as vapour to the atmosphere. That makes the water that does accumulate even more acidic.

And guess what that acidic water will do? It will dissolve more elements and compounds into the water. That is where the “primordial soup” came from, once it started to basin. Once pooled, the soup can literally simmer.

What is the one thing molecules need to complexify? Energy. Miller-Urey used electricity as the main energy source. Not a bad guess, but wrong. Some heat, but primarily electricity. However, I feel it was NOT electricity. Rather, it was HEAT as the Primary energy source.

At that time, Earth’s atmosphere was also possibly filled with perhaps Gigajoules of static electrical potential energy. However, any lightning would have burned any primordial basin, killing any chance for life to abiogenesize. Leaving only burnt organic compounds to decay.

If it basined once, it will do it again. A do-over.

And that decay can feed complexification even more. T…H…I…N…K…

Even in low VAmps, electricity burns molecules apart. It flows through the electron shells instead of into the nucleus. THAT is why we use metals for electrical distribution.

The heat from the Earth would have been a much more reliable form of energy. Slower. Steadier. Then the molecules can absorb energy without being burned apart. They could slowly complexify into more and more complex molecules.

Scientists hypothesize that the first “self-replicating” molecule was similar to RNA. RNA is the simplest molecule that self-replicates. Major problem with self-replication. It is literally NEVER perfect. Yes, that 0.000 000 000 000 000 001% chance of a perfect copy does exist. Cellular mitosis is never perfect. That is why we age and die.

Eventually two RNA found each other and hooked-up. Either was different enough it caused a mutual attraction. RNA becomes DNA. DNA begins clumping, eventually forms nucleus, then more eventually, creates the first single cell living organism. Prokaryotic.

Some more eventually, a larger prokaryote enveloped a smaller prokaryote intending to consume it. Something goes differently. Instead of consuming the smaller, the larger enslaved the smaller into an “energy factory”. The first Mitochondrial Eukaryotic Life. MEL. And weren’t she wonderful?

AND more eventually, MEL invents the greatest invention Life could have stumbled upon.

BISEXUAL REPLICATION

Combining TWO genetic sources instead of copying one ad infinitum.

Basically, it was The Great Earth Mother that literally “farted”, then “cooked” Life into existence from that which is lifeless.

Now answer: Is my Life from lifelessness hypothesis plausible?

Just because you Inexorable beLIEvers do not like, nor enjoy my word usage, does NOT make it any less plausible.

From Another View

Abiogenesis is the science of the Formation of Life.

Evolution is the science of the Diversification of Life.

NOT the same, but complimentary.

And the Best Analogy of All

Earth farted, then slowly cooked Life into existence.
Using the most common substance in the galaxy, WATER.
THAT is how Life came from Lifelessness.
All… Natural… Processes.
— The Unknown Atheist

And how is that any different than the Invisible Pink Unicorn farting Rainbows and creating Life on Earth? OR, the Giant Cosmic Bunny Rabbit. Ever notice how their turds are shaped like planets?

Let Me Throw In A Dime…

There are many ridiculous things that DO hep disprove your God-Thing. It is just that Inexorable beLIEvers cannot understand humorous, yet accurate, analogies.

Flying Spaghetti Monster: Why are planets shaped like meatballs?

Invisible Pink Unicorn: How can I know it is pink if it is invisible?

Dragon in My Garage: Moving the Goal Posts. Cannot win.

Russell’s Teapot: Will never be proven False.

The Christinsane God-Thing: Ugghhh … Simply the most horrible monster ever created by humans. … …

Wild Tangent

There was a time when I could go to the local market with a silver quarter, buy the equivalent of a Ziploc Sandwich bag of bit candy, about two of my fists, and still at least get a silver dime in change.

Now days, that silver quarter would be worth more as silver than capable of buying anything.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

ICIDIC

I stole this from Star Trek™, the Vulcan IDIC: Infinite Diversity from Infinite Combinations. I had to have read about the IDIC somewhere. So long ago I cannot remember what, how, when, where, so do not ask.

I then made it: Infinite Complexity from Infinite Diversity through Infinite Combinations.

We have seen how life can create the most complex biomolecular “machines”. YES! Literally machines built with biologics. Bacterial flagellum is the perfect example. When we looked at it on the molecular level, we were absolutely astonished. It DID resemble a rotary motor that a human could have built.

However, as humans delved deeper, we found the true “infinite complexity” of Life. Just because something natural looks to have been designed from intelligence, NEVER implies or infers “intelligent design”. NOR does it imply nor infer a “purpose”.

Never use inference. Instead, use deduction. Deduction utilizes critical thinking, logic, rationality, reasoning. Inference is just a wish.

Want to know why (reasonable level) “intelligent design” ain’t science, but pure fantasy?

To even claim something is “intelligently designed”, you MUST First prove the “intelligent designer”.

The IDF (Intelligent Design Fallacy) is nothing more than creationism rebranded. Regardless of those monumental mountains of Word Salad, Gish Gallop, Horse Hoowhee, Bull Stinky, and Brain Diarrhea you Religitards spew from your lips. Ain’t that what the anus is for?

A MUST Remember

Evolution within Life NEVER attempts a “specific” solution. INSTEAD, evolution tries ANY solution. Then the only criteria is it survives to reproduce, spreading those alleles amongst the population.

Some solutions are bad. Some good. And the infinite gamut (a complete extent, scope, and/or range) between.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

The Other Two Brains

Everyone knows about the left/right hemispheres of our brains. There are two other brains, The Animal Side, said like Riddick in Pitch Black, and The Human Side.

Guess which side Inexorable beLIEvers use exclusively when processing any data, even science? The Animal Side. Science has proven this with a brain scan method that detects where in the brain persons are processing information, LIVE, as they think. When trying to process scientific data, Inexorable beLIEvers use The Animal Side of their brain. Exclusively. That is not how science is done.

The image below shows both Neander and Sapien. See the differences? Sapien human side is 2 to 3 times larger than the Neander. But notice the size difference in the animal side. I hypothesize the Neanders were the last humans to actually have Genetic Memories. We lost this when the human side grew larger.

Actually, I hypothesize that Genetic Memories are a great hinderance to the development of a prefrontal cortex. If brain-pan is limited in size, then those Genetic Memories consume most of volume unfolding. Thus, great hinderance. However, a mutation in one group took hold and rapidly disseminated. You had Sapiens. We lost our Genetic Memories, but gained the greatest of thoughts: Invention.

The arrows show how the skull shape changed shape.

That is the reason us Sapiens out-competed and extincted the Neanders, the differences in the other two brains: The Animal Side, and The Human Side.

The human side is also called the prefrontal cortex. It is responsible for giving us Sapiens:

greater reasoning,

greater rationality,

greater imagination,

higher-order invention,

critical thinking,

higher-order logic,

greater deduction,

SANITY.

With processing religious propaganda, almost all persons first utilize The Animal Side of the brain, for religion is entirely based upon emotions, never intellect. Where all our emotions come from. Only true scientists and true skeptical thinkers use The Human Side when processing religious propaganda. This Begs My Question:

“Since you Inexorable beLIEvers always use The Animal Side of your brain, the MOST fallacious and irrational part of the brain, this explains why NO Inexorable beLIEver can understand science. Thus, what gives you the Right to say/write anything science? Only to show your stupidity?”

Because if you cannot understand science, you have no RIGHT to speaking/writing anything science. NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER. Where essentially the only thing you can say about science is Pure Evil LIEs.

And since emotional thinking is already fallacious and irrational before the thought is even thought, it is actually the religious that are the primitive savages. They do not know how to think without their emotions. Thus, if religion must predate upon emotions to make it beLIEvable, which is already fallacious and irrational, why would you beLIEve in any religion?

Yes, I can understand the “spiritual” need. Even I, called the most “hard-dicked” scientist, has a “spiritual” side. Everyone has it. Even I find the thought of having a spirit that can exist forever VERY appealing. Then I could eventually learn the ALL-Knowledge and become my own God-Thing. Create my own universe amongst the multiverse.

BTW-FYI: The term “hard-dicked” was used by a student when asked how hard a teacher I was. However, his full reply was, ensuring I heard him, “He is the most hard-dicked scientist I’ve ever encountered. But he is damned good in the way he tries to make you think instead of just telling you everything.”

Additionally, education and knowledge about science (the true stuff) is a killer for religion. Inexorable beLIEvers know this; thus, they MUST create beLIEvable lies about science by perverting and twisting it until it is science that seems ridiculous. Then they utilize Empathic Predation to force you to use your emotions against your intellect. Inexorable beLIEvers also know that chemical rush we can have from great emotions. That great A-HA! instant. Those neurotransmitter chemicals can behave like illicit psychedelics in the enforcement of that “Warm Fuzzy” such emotions can cause. It is called Psychosomaticism. Self-Reinforcement of false beLIEfs.

No Inexorable beLIEver has the capability of actually proving their fantasies true. Thus, the reiteration, Inexorable beLIEvers MUST use beguiling semantics, prestidigitative dialect, and empathic predation to make YOU use your emotions against your intellect. Abbreviated, I call this MREMPT: Mental Rape, Emotional Molestation, Psychological Terrorism. Am I the only person who can see this? I have extensive studies into abnormal psychology and have studied the DSM extensively since the 3rd edition, the DSM-III.

I studied abnormal psychology in advanced classes (500+) at (university withheld) and the DSM because I wanted to know if I could get the “old me” back after a particularly devestating accident. Alas, I found I am now what I am and cannot get the “old me” back. Bummer… It just so happened as I studied for me self, I also saw the disorders common amongst the Inexorable beLIEvers. I was studying to know if I could get the old me back, and I also saw the dissertation: “How Inexorable Religious Beliefs should be Reclassified in the DSM.” It was not until this time that I found my answers to the insanity of inexorable religious beliefs. Then, about three years later, a Civilized Believer published his journal paper on all those brain scans he had made. This was the proof that inexorable religious beliefs poisons a mind and can cause irrepairable brain damage. Religion teaches that being illiterate to everything outside that religion is perfectly fine. Besides, it makes you too stupid to see through their lies.

Another way to look at this. You have the Human side and Animal side. You could view it as the Good side versus the Bad side. ALL Sapiens have both good and evil within. Just like we have the Human and Animal within. I was forced to use my intellect. My brain worked more like a logical Vulcan with emotions as a burdensome attachment.

Mr. Spock IS my greatest Hero. “Please, Doctor. Logic and reason always finds a solution.”

— The Unknown Atheist

P.S.– Did you know that Star Trek, the original series was the VERY first time I saw the Great Science and Religion War on television? Mr. Spock was Science, while McCoy was Religion. Kirk mediated.

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

On Purposefulness

Why MUST everything have “purpose”?

You Inexorable beLIEvers are confusing existence with purpose. Wrong.

Life, Existence, Universe simply are. As Sean Carroll quoted from Bertrand Russell, and now I paraphrase from memory, “One must simply realize origin theory MUST bottom out on one simple, brutal FACT: The Universe, Life, Existence just simply ARE. Definitely without purpose. Definitely without guidance.” Simple FACT. IT just is.

So…, when Life has evolved the most destructive force known in the universe, Humans, where was the “purpose” in that?

Think. Would you belive that “entropy” is Life’s God-Thing? Go research entropy and see if you can figure out the connection I made.

7734, I may tell you before this is finished.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

What Atheism IS and “AIN’T”

A refusal to accept preposterous claims for the existence of any supernatural entity.

I can NOT put it any simpler. Maybe less words: “Unconvinced any deity exists.”

AND, atheism has absolutely NOTHING to do with ANYthing else.

Evolution, Science, Morality, Rationality, Critical Thinking, gods… the list is endless. To be perfectly frank and candor, my atheism actually derives from my capability to learn, to research, to think critically, to think rationally, and to logically analyze the evidence.

Stephen Woodford, “Rationality Rules”, said something I have been saying for half century or longer, “The more knowledge I learn, the probability of any god existing approaches ever closer to ZERO.”

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

What “CAN” Philosophy Prove?

ONLY two things.

You can tell the truth.

You can convincingly lie.

Sorry. Philosophy proves nothing else. Can NOT prove anything else. Philosophy only proves you can speak truthfulness, and that you can convincingly lie.

Thus, all that Word Salad, Gish Gallop, Horse Hoowhee, Bull Stinky, and Brain Diarrhea is useless. Utterly. Since philosophy cannot be used to determine truthfulness, why do you Religitards rely exclusively on Mouth Poopoo and Brain Diarrhea? IT is ONLY useful for keeping believers, beLIEvers.

And to do so REQUIRES beLIEvable prevarications instead of empirical evidence. I ask for proof, and all I get from Inexorable beLIEvers is Mouth Poopoo. Brain Diarrhea. Wish someone would invent Brain-Pepto…

Philosophy only proves truthfulness ONLY if it is already proven True.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Difference of Philosophy and Logic

Logic is Cold. Cruel. Heartless. Unforgiving. Uncaring.

Philosophy is Friendly, Accepting, that “Warm Fuzzy”.

Logic has ONLY one answer in the forms of: True/False, Yes/No, On/Off, 1/0. There ARE NO tweeners.

Philosophy has infinite answers once you include all those Buts, Lies, Howevers, Wannabes, Faerie Tales, Washy Wishes, et cetera, et alia.

Logic, if used correctly, proves you can think critically to your own degree and magnitude, and can deduce a correct True/False answer. But, not always.

Philosophy may prove you can think. However, philosophy itself ONLY proves two things:

You can speak truthfulness.

You can convincingly lie.

Thus, philosophy alone proves nothing.

Philosophiæ, being a METHOD of thinking, follows only Logic to deduce truthfulness. And “truthfulness” has the same range as probability: 0 ≤T < 1. Nevertheless, Truth does = 1, whereas False = 0.

Scientists will usually say something akin to this: “We do not know for sure. But, models do suggest… blah, blah, blah.” AND, I do NOT mean “blah, blah, blah” in a derogatory sense. I actually mean ⊂whatever⊃ subject currently discussed. David (@carm.org); If you had Reading Comprehension, I WOULD NOT have to explain it.

What Inexorable beLIEvers of today are doing is forcing (sometimes called “shoe-horning”) “their” philosophy into Logic. It does not work that way.

Philosophy only proves truth if it is demonstrably True. Philosophy proves lie if it is demonstrably False.

Furthermore, some Inexorable beLIEvers of today have been able to gather wealth enough to bribe their brain-washed “intellectuals” with complete paid-for BSc, MSc, PhD, ScD within a field of science. The contract, usually written and signed, is they will “keep the faith” regardless, then misappropriate science Language to pervert and twist to fit within “their” narrative.

Just ask Georgia Purdy how much Ken Ham Bribed her.

To take any demonstrable Truth and convert it into a beLIEvable prevarication “IS PERVERTED”. Meaning, “mentally, deranged and twisted beyond the mortal kin”.

It actually REQUIRES a perverted and Evil mind to lie about the truth to an audience. Only to further your gathering of riches and treasures and CONTROL. IT may be your PoV, but to actively and knowingly LIE to people about something you know NOTHING about is Evil.

Matt Slick (@carm.org) once asked me this: “Do you believe evil exists?”

Answer: “I do NOT believe evil exists. I KNOW Evil exists. It is called RELIGION.” And I never heard back from him in 25± years.

And this Evil, known as religion, has plagued Humanity for at least 100Ka. As KNOWledge increases, religion MUST evolve, or it dies. You Inexorable beLIEvers say Evolution is False, yet you never offer any OHEEF. You only offer monumental piles of Brain Diarrhea as Mouth Poopoo.

THE ULTIMATE "Ultimate Challenge" for ALL Religion

FACT: In just the USofA alone, religion pulls in 100s of Billions of $ each year. TAX-FREE.

Why does not religion gather its equivalent of the NAS (National Academy of Sciences) and put all those $ behind your dogmatic rhetoric?

Do like RTP in NC, foundationed by IBM, purchase your own large chunk of land, then build your own R&D complex to research and prove Science, False. Prove the supernatural co-exists along with the natural. Quit with the Brain Diarrhea and Mouth Poopoo.

Wild Tangent: Why is it the Inexorable beLIEvers Forum Board Sites practice the most censorship? Why are they so bigoted?

I shall always repeat something Sir Arthur C Clarke once said, paraphrased, “Any faith that cannot withstand scrutiny is not a faith much worth losing.”

Thus, with this ULTIMATE challenge, why do you beLIEvers not actually work to prove your Brain Diarrhea? Quit spewing it all over people. Dump it in the toilet, and flush.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Difference of Philosophy and Philosophiæ

The main differences:

Philosophy is a Way of thinking.

Philosophiæ is a Method of thinking.

And again, the obfuscation and ambiguity is caused by Inexorable beLIEvers inability to understand. Which definitely means they cannot comprehend.

It is the philosophiæ where the Inexorable beLIEvers confuse themselves. They equate doctoral philosophiæ with truthfulness. If a PhD says it, it must be true. Especially if us Inexorable beLIEvers can easily pervert and twist it to fit our narrative.

C’mon. It is as obvious as your nose. Inexorable beLIEverism ABUSES science in order to appease their masses. To further “their” gathering of riches and wealth, and CONTROL.

Unlike philosophy, which uses a twisted version of Logic, philosophiæ utilizes the prefrontal cortex for the methodology of logical deduction, rationality, reasoning, critical thinking, and True Logic.

Philosophy uses the emotions. Thus, Religion MUST prey upon the emotions. I call it Empathic Predation. A method of psychological warfare that makes YOU use your own emotions in order to override your intellect. A nasty way of putting it, but truthful, is that Inexorable beLIEvers “Mind-Fuck” you. Only Inexorable beLIEvers will find that repugnant.

How can you trust any person whom purposefully, with evil intent, literally “mind-fucks” you?

A few to whom that question applies to are: Ken Ham, Bill Craig, Matt Slick, Casey Luskin, Stephen Meyers, Michael Behe, Kent & Eric Hovind, William Dembski, Franklin Graham,

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

How Inexorable beLIEvers Make YOU beLIEve

They cannot understand/comprehend science.

It makes no sense to them.

They pervert and twist it until no truth remains.

They fabricate beLIEvable claims because they “feel” correct.

They learn how to convincingly lie to an audience.

They prey upon the emotions utilizing the quick “warm-fuzzy” they give.

They convince beLIEvers of their prevarications by forcing YOU to use your emotions against YOUR intellect.

“It SEEMS so true.” “It FEELS so true.”

And the grandest trick of them all: Cannon Fodder.

Cannon Fodder is the Word Salad, Gish Gallop, Horse Hoowhee, Bull Stinky, and Brain Diarrhea.

They bombard with so great a fusillade of Cannon Fodder, the intellect has not the time to process it. They utilize a technique known as IRSS, Incoherent Rapid Speech Synthesis. It attacks the emotions with its rapid-fire fusillade. FEELS so damned correct.

But, just enough twisting of the truth to kind-of make emotional sense and make it “FEEL” true.

This practice by the Inexorable beLIEvers is actually a form psychological warfare. Brain-Washing. Mind-Fuck.

Why is this obvious to only me?

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

The Incompatibility of the 4 Omnis

Omnipotence

Omniscience

Omnipresence

Omnibenevolence

First off, omnipotence and omniscience ARE mutually exclusive. No Thing can be both ALL-Powerful and ALL-Knowing. Then Sociopathic Bill comes along and changes it to, “Knowledgeable enough and Powerful enough.” Whatever the 7734 that is supposed to mean.

If you have the power to change your omniscience, you ain’t omniscient. If you can NOT change your omniscience, you ain’t omnipotent. So easy to refute those two. Make them mutually exclusive.

Being Everywhere at once just does not make any kind of coherent sense, in any meaning of the word. I can not be both “here AND there” at the same time. Thus, throw omnipresence out as impossible.

Read those bible-thingies and there is your proof your God-Things are definitively NOT Good. “Humans have never created any deity better than themselves. Instead, IT behaves like a childish, spoiled brat who cannot get ITs way.”, paraphrased from Robert A Heilein. Reminds me of Trelane. There goes omnibenevolence.

However, that still leaves having omnipotence OR omniscience. Cannot have both. Only one.

Essentially, the 4 Omnis are self-contradictive.

What is the speed of your God-Thing?

Does your God-Thing also suffer the same limitations while farting around in our universe? That means your God-Thing is limited to just short of Light Speed. What if your God-Thing was dealing with the peoples of Anamaris. And Anamaris is 19,326 LY away. That means your God-Thing will not get back to Earth until around the year 21411CE. If Humans survived until then, we would be as technologically powerful as your God-Thing. Then we could beat ITs arse and tell IT to never bother us again.

How is that for stupidity?

However, since your God-Thing is NOT omnipresent, it IS limited by THIS universe’s “laws”, as y’awl call them, meaning it MUST travel from PntA to PntB. Further meaning your God-Thing is limited by the LightBarrier.

Thus, do not worry. Your God-Thing will eventually get here from wherever it went. 2000 years after ITs death. What if it took 2000 years to go to wherever. That means IT ain’t due back until 4040CE. Got to give IT time to deal with whatever at wherever, then travel back here.

Then again, it could have taken 990 years there, 20 years to do another “Jesus”-thing, then 990 years back. Thus, IT could be due back any day now. Hmm…

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

No Stupid Questions

There truly is no such thing as a stupid question except the one that goes unasked.

But there are Unnecessary Questions

The Worst: Have you heard about the Good News?

Honestly, in the USofA, since the 1950s, how in 7734 could I have NOT heard about that supposed Good News? Perfect example of an Unnecessary Question.

Another: “What are you eating?”, when you can plainly see I am eating a burger and fries. This one does border on being stupid. But, I have had people ask.

Need I say more?

— The Unknown Atheist

P.S.– Another: I keep getting large postcards asking, “Are you pregnant? Are you trying?” I look down, and say, “I hope not.” I am a male. Completely Unnecessary Questions. Yet they somehow cannot distinguish my checkbox for “M”? This also borders on Stupidity.

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

My Cosmos and Universe Model

I already know this model is incorrect. However, it is the model I use and it has never failed me. Especially, the Open Model.

The Cosmos is the “framework” for everything. Without the cosmos, Nothing Itself would exist. The cosmos is eternal. How? Why? Two good questions that shall never be answered by us Humans. So, why quibble? The cosmos is the “framework” within which the universe, space, time, energy, blah, blah, blah… can expand into. It is always there waiting.

The Universe, meaning the blah, blah, blah… within which we exist, is what is expanding into the cosomos. As the universe expands, it drags the blah, blah, blah… with it. In fact, it is the energy part that is forcing the expansion. Once the energy is all gone, no further expansion.

Now comes the problem of the Closed Universe Model and Open Universe Model.

Closed Model

The Big Bang. Expansion. All energy gone. Universe is utterly dead. Everything ends. Only NOTHING exists forevermore.

Open Model

The Big Bang. Expansion. All energy gone. Maximal Entropy. Gravity takes over and contracts everything back into another THE Singularity. Thermodynamics are not violated since an universe’s worth of energy is put back into THE Singularity. BOOM! A new universal Iteration. Will it have the same “fundamental constants”? Cosmos exists while Universe expands, contracts, expands, contracts, … for all eternity. Never ending. Never beginning.

Of course, the Open Model would also Beg the Question:

Which ITERATION are we currently in?

That quesion is entirely moot. Even if this universe is the very first Inception, or, the ten millionth billionth trillionth quadrillionth Inception, there would be another, and another, and another, and …

And if this universe is Open, it again does not matter which iteration we are in. “THIS” IS THE CURRENT ITERATION. And you do not get more. This is the only life you have. Why not make the best of it you can? Why not be more helpful toward Humanity?

Teach them “how to think” instead of telling them what to think.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Inexorable beLIEver Entropy PoV

Is Utterly Wrong

And Completely Backwards

PoV = Point-of-View.

Entropy is directly proportional to Energy. Entropy ↔ Energy. Now think.

Let us compare “Sol” to a “human body”:

Which one is in a higher energy state?

Which one is in a lower energy state?

Which one is in a higher entropic state?

Which one is in a lower entropic state?

Is not a higher energy ↔ higher entropy actually more indicative of a more chaotic state?

Is not a lower energy ↔ lower entropy actually more indicative of a more orderly state?

T…H…I…N…K…

Yes! Biological organisms are exceptionally complex. “Infinitely”, I have always said. Simply proves the ICIDIC Hypothesis I developed now going on 45+y ago? Damn! THAT long? As think, almost 50, but 49y to be more exact.

Dan Brown offered an interesting hypothesis in his novel Origin. Life came into existence in order to lower the entropy of the universe. Life IS exceptionally complex. Yet, it is in a more orderly state.

Here is another confusion caused by science. Maximal Entropy simply means Entropy = 0. Thus, it may seem Entropy and Energy are not directly proportional when in FACT they are.

For this example, I am using the range of 0 ≤ E ≤ 1.

When Energy = 0, Entropy also = 0. No energy for “chaos”.

When Energy = 1, Entropy also = 1. Too much energy for “order”.

What kind of speeds do biologics operate? Nerve conductivity is fastest at about 120 m/s. Everything else is much slower. Since it is “gravity” keeping Sol from going nova, speeds at which a star operates become limited. BUT, they operate at a much, much, …much higher energetic state.

Basically it is the Inexorable beLIEvers whom equate Entropy with Chaos. Then they spread that Horse Hoowhee with beLIEvable prevarications.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Zero-Point Power Theory

Sometimes called “vacuum energy”. When reduced to as close to 0K environment we can make, a few trillionths, Helium still remains a liquid capable of motility, even in defiance of gravity. Helium does not solidify until it is put under 4atm pressure. Perhaps THERE is the True Standard for 0K?

Only problem is space. Inert elements like Helium will only exist as single atoms. They do not even react with themselves. Thus, Helium will always be gaseous. No matter how “cold” the environment may seem. And being gaseous means very little pressure except that imparted by gravity. And, Helium will not obey gravity.

This has now been named the “Cassimir Effect”. It is a repeatable FACT that energetic interaction still exists, even at 0K. This interaction actually can be used to produce power. The very first detection of power production was so incredibly small, it was laughable. However, in 40±y, we have been able to increase that power detection about 4 million fold. Still incredibly small amounts. But more easily detectable. If only …

That is almost literally power from nothing. However …

See “Cosmic Power Theory” next.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Cosmic Power Theory

As 0Pnt power demonstrates there is still power even at 0K when all activity is supposed to be 0. We can detect “cosmic radiation”, i.e.– cosmic energy, the most energetic partical-waveform within the Electromagnetic Spectrum. But have we detected Cosmic Power? Two different monkies.

An energy form has a frequency in its waveform. If the waveform is 10 meters long, then that energy is essentially harmless. If the waveform cycles a billion times a second, POOF!, you are completely, utterly atomized. Cosmic radiation, cosmic energy, is akin to the Poofer form of energy. In all actuality, you would not go Poof. If collimatoried into a focused beam, the energy would bore a hole through you before you even realized it had happened. Then just keel over dead from the overwhelming shock.

Cosmic Power is not electromagnetism. It is similar to 0Pnt Power, but one the Cosmic level. Not just the Universe as with 0Pnt Power. It is there, even if we do not understand a reasonable level why. It may be detectable. If it is detectable, it may be tappable. Remember, if it can be detected, it may possibly be tappable as an energy source.

Now comes the However from “Zero-Point Power Theory” before.

Could pulling power from either/both these sources cause irrevocable harm to Existence ITs self? What if these are powers that MUST NOT BE TAMPERED WITH? We can detect them all we wish, but we, perhaps, MUST not tamper with.

Herein lies that problem. We CANNOT KNOW if such would happen until we actually did tap into such power. And once we tap into it, what if it is already too late at that inceptual tapping? Could THAT mean the End of ALL Existence? …

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

“NOTHING” Has Never Existed

Title says it all. Nothing itself does not even exist. Nothing would mean no properties whatsoever, such as energy, mass, gravity, length, durance, et cetera, et alia. Nothing, at best, is an abstract fantasy that does not exist in Reality. That is not to say in a Fantastical reality, Nothing can be played with such as The Gates of Absolution. Absolution being a place where even Nothing ITs self can exist. Thus, what must this Absolution be like?

Then theists will scream, “What about outside…” To which I reply, “What exactly do you mean by “outside”?”

No Inexorable beLIEver can sufficiently define what exactly they mean by outside the universe. Then they tack on spaceless, timeless, immaterial which means ONLY one thing: Non-Existent, Non-Corporeal, Non-Entity.

It cannot be spaceless, then there would be no space for IT to exist. To exist, you MUST have space.

It cannot be timeless, then there would never have been any time for ITs “creation event” action. All actions MUST have time.

Immaterial, meaning non-existent. To exist, you also need material. Else, no existence.

Even outside this universe, ultimately meaning in an “otherverse”, IT would still need space, time, and material.

Casually Debunked.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Ceramimetallic Life?

This one, even I have to admit, is quite a stretch. Like a gnat’s arse stretched over the end of an oil barrel… But think.

Chemically, silicon (Si) behaves very similar to carbon (C). Almost exactly the same. Major problem is the size difference. Silicon is about 2× larger. Fact-Check: I was wrong. It is only about 1.58× larger, but still too large. For biologics, that is an incredibly large molecule to deal with. Thus, we no use.

Carbon and silicon are in the same period after all. In our studies, we have found no reason why life could not be based on silicon. The most common substance on Earth’s crust is silicon dioxide (SiO₂) as the sand beneath your feet.

However, silicon is also a “metalloid” where carbon is not. Carbon is mineral. Silicon can behave like a mineral, but also can behave like a metal (the group: B, Si, Ge, As, Sb, Te, Po). Therein lies the problem of life based on silicon. It can be both mineral and metal in its reactivity with other elements.

Based on silicon, but also composed of perhaps germanium, iron, calcium, magnesium, et cetera, et alia. Just like humans have mostly “mineral” elements. Silicon would also be loaded with minerals, but also metals. To even achieve motility, such a life form would require tremendous heat. Pressure to help keep a “solid” form, but also tremendous heat for motility.

I call it a ceramimetallic life due to its possible constituents. Minerals and metals with virtually no gases. In this reference, gases would literally include anything below element-21, Scandium. We have ceramic crucibles that can withstand enough heat to melt most metals. It would need the ceramic (mineral) constituents in order to maintain a “body” form. The metals would serve other purposes. What about molten iron acting like our blood within their “body”? Or, perhaps another metal with a lower melting point? Easier to keep in liquid form for “blood”.

How is reproduction achieved? Asexual? Could it be Bisexual with two contributing a lump each? In my definition of what makes life, life, what would be the processes of consumption, excretion, homeostasis, etc.?

Could there be ceramimetallic life? I have seen nothing to suggest it could happen. But does that mean NEVER possible? I also hypothesize that such life would REQUIRE actinides for their “food”. Thus, they would be much more resistive to radiation that would turn us into a pool of goo. “Clean up. Lab Four.”

Wild Tangent: Since consumption of food also requires expulsion of waste, and lesser dense materials will “float” upwards even within solids, one could say we surface dwellers are living on the excretion of those life forms deep within the Earth. We are living on their poopoo. :-P

And, IF, a tremendously huge IF, such life existed, would it even deign to actually visit the surface? 7734, NO! It is much too frigid to them. They would truly “solidify” into rock. Dead. Or, until heated enough? And resurrect?

more may be added later… But this is a good example of where Stupidity in Science can take one. Yet try to figure out plausibility.

David, do you not think that kind of kookiness requires critical thinking? In FACT, the more kooky the scientific thinking WOULD REQUIRE a greater amount of critical thinking. Despite my juvenile language use? Is that NOT the best way to reach the general populace? I am simply using the same childish language that Religitards utilize. You just do not like the “presentation” style AND subject matter. For the basis of the subject matter is something NO Religitard has any Knowledge of. 7734, you Religitards cannot understand science. Thus, none of you shall ever comprehend it.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Principles of Probability

I can learn all I need on what you DO know about the basics of Probability with just two questions:

What is the probability of the emergence of life in this universe? Explain.

What is the probability of the emergence of “intelligent” life in this universe? Explain.

Something no Inexorable beLIEver can ever understand. Do any of you Religitards truly understand the Principles of Probability?

There are two methods for probability: additive and multiplicative. Inexorable beLIEvers exclusively use the additive method.

If a list of probabilities are: 0.238863, 0.010051, 0.008243, 0.090881. Inexorable beLIEvers will add these factors to get 0.348038, or 34.8%.

Same list: 0.238863 × 0.010051 × 0.008243 × 0.090881 = 0.00000179852, or 0.00018%.

That is how probability works. And it does not give a damn about your washy-wishes. Your Howevers. Your Whatifs. Your Buts.

Let us use your God-Thing for example. You Theists have added so many factors (each with its own probability factor) to what your God-Thing “IS”, you have literally factored IT out of any possible existence.

And that is what makes religion so damned funny. You Inexorable beLIEvers have worked so hard to prove your God-Thing exists for about 2000 years. Yet all you have done is prove how your God-Thing CANNOT exist.

Funny.

As said, you Inexorable beLIEvers have added so many factors to what your God-Thing “IS”, you have factored it out of any possible existence.

Well…, There is one place that God-Thing can always exist. Inside the tiny miscreant mind of an individual.

When it comes to Probability, remember these two things:

Additive Method only answers a “percentage of” (How much?).

Multiplicative Method only answers a “percentage chance” (How likely?).

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Legal Stuff

Front Cover image is based upon a photo of an artichoke bloom I grew.

© Copyright 2025-0615-1900 by RMF Runyan, Arakish Geideiri. All other Rights Reserved.

Although Copyright, this eBook is also officially licensed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy.

Translations

Please do. Just remember the original Copyright and CC License, and add yours. But remember your addenda also goes under the CC License…

Fair Use

Images were either captured, or stolen from the WWW from many, many, … many URLs from decades past. Most of those WWW sites are long ancient. 99.99% probably no longer exist. However, perhaps one may still find the originals doing an image search.

Fonts were stolen from google fonts.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

And… Too… Many… More…

And I have many more essays I have written while sitting on the back deck. Basically, thoughts I have as I allow me mind to roam about on its Wild Tangents. Not all is about religion versus science. I have others. That is why I carry four spiral notebooks outside to Ponder. One for science. One for religion. One for fantasy. One for science-fiction.

I may get around to publishing them, but probably not. This treatise in EPUB format definitely refutes religion to the point you should be able to see religion for the lies religion is. Religion promises Everything, but delivers nothing.

If you cannot see, then you are mad and lost.

Questions No Inexorable beLIEver Can Answer

You CANNOT use anything “religious” to answer these questions. I MUST be able to fact-check your answers. If I cannot fact-check, you prove your self a liar, bully, Thug.

1) How CAN I believe in anything I can demonstrably falsify?

2) Why SHOULD I believe in anything you Religitards say/write since all is 100% Pure Unadulterated Hearsay ?

3) Why is it easier to believe a lie than it is to know a truth?

4) How could a ship with a Total Volume of only 44,000 cubic meters (giving benefit of doubt) hold 8 million animals?

5) Why can no Religitard offer actual proof and evidence their God-Thing exists?

Why is it always Word Salad, Gish Gallop, Horse Hoowhee, Bull Stinky, and Brain Diarrhea that proves nothing?

6) Why do ONLY Religitards find anything offensive?

Why is EVERYTHING offensive to ONLY Religitards?

7) What makes Your religion True and all the 30,000+ other religions False?

8) Why must religion always resort to violence and rape to enforce its beLIEfs?

REMEMBER: You CANNOT use religion to answer. I must be able to fact-check your answers. For #8, do you NOT think that “mind-fucking” people with lies ain’t violence and rape?

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

God the Father,
Jesus the Son,
and the Holy Ghost
The Three Stooges.

You do not think The Three Stooges, circa 1930s to 1950s were not a “play” on religion? Think really hard. The Three Stooges were a perfect play on the difference between Reality and Fantasy. Sorry, but you may have to think really hard on this connection I made.

You Christinsanes want proof your God-Thing is stupider that the average bear? (A play on Yogi Bear.)

Matthew 5:13 – “You are the salt of the earth, but if the salt has lost its flavor, with what will it be salted? It is then good for nothing, but to be cast out and trodden under the feet of men.”

If your God-Thing were truly knowledgeable on even a child’s level, that THING would know salt cannot lose its taste. It can have its flavor altered, but salt will remain salt. Only through other chemical processes or nuclear processes would salt EVER lose its flavor. And that would take a form of nuclear fission (separating the sodium and chlorine atoms). If you take salt and dissolve it in water, it seems to come apart. Nope. Evaporate the water and you will be left with almost virtually the same exact amount of salt you added to the water. Not to mention other minerals and metals dissolved in the water that you boiled the salt in. If your God-Thing were truly knowledgeable (which this proves IT ain’t), IT would have NEVER said “if salt loses its flavor”… Salt cannot lose its flavor unless you separate the sodium and chlorine atoms on the nuclear scale. Think, Stupid.

Luke 14:26 – “If anyone comes to me and does not “hate” his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.”

Just like any tyrannical dictator. I must hate everything, even ME self, but I am commanded to obey and love that tyrannical dictator? In other words, I am ONLY to love this tyrannical dictator and despise everything else, me dad, me mom, me brothers and sisters, me wife, me children, etc., et al.? As I have said: If I cannot TRUST you, why should I OBEY you?

Matthew 6:24 – “No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.”

Funny part here is that it is the Inexorable beLIEvers and Religitards that pursue money, wealth, treasures, power, and CONTROL. Why is that? Those whom are actually Human, do not. AND, here is the kicker, the Religitards KNOW they worship power and control over others, and use the bible-thingy to explain why they need even more money. “Give unto me, and thou shalt roll in the wealth of My God-Thing.” And they utilize a form of “psychological warfare” known as “Empathic Predation”. Look it up.

Mark 11:13-14, 19-21 – Seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came to see if perhaps he might find anything on it. When he came to it, he found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season for figs. Jesus told it, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again!” and his disciples heard it. When evening came, he went out of the city. As they passed by in the morning, they saw the fig tree withered away from the roots. Peter, remembering, said to him, “Rabbi, look! The fig tree which you cursed has withered away.”

Your God-Thing KNEW it was NOT the season for any figs, yet like a childish, spoiled brat that THING destroyed a living thing. For no other reason that it was not the season for figs. WHAT THE 7734!?! This here alone proves that the Christinsane God-Thing is an Evil, Wicked, Mean, and Nasty Devil. You Christinsanes are actually worshipping Satan. Satan fooled ALL you Religitards. Because that THING in that bible-thingy behaves more Evil than Satan does.

Hang On a minute… You mean to tell me that Your God-Thing, KNOWing the figs were “out-of-season” simply destroyed that tree simply because figs were “NOT-IN-SEASON”? WTFHISTB? Please explain.

Genesis 6:13-15 – God said to Noah, “I will bring an end to all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence through them. Behold, I will destroy them and the earth. Make a ship of gopher wood. You shall make rooms in the ship, and shall seal it inside and outside with pitch. This is how you shall make it. The length of the ship shall be three hundred cubits, its width fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits.”

You Religitards do know that the “cubit” is classified as the “Original fudging measurement tool”? Its historical range of measures ranged from 44.4 to 52.92 cm (1 ft 5½ in to 1 ft 8¹³/₁₆ in), with an ancient Roman cubit being as long as 120 cm (3 ft 11 in). It only took 5000 years to settle on the ISO Standard of 18 inches. Me, the avg(), 19.15625 inches. 0.15625 = 5/32nds inches. But, let us make it nice and easy to work with, 20. Now convert to metric, 20" = 50.8 centimeters (cm).

50.8 × 300 = 15,240cm L

50.8 × 50 = 2540cm W

50.8 × 30 = 1524cm H

In a perfect rectangular prism, that is 15240 × 2540 × 1524 = 58 993 430 400 cubic centimeters. Dividing by 1 million, we get 58,993.43 cubic meters. Even that large is not enough to carry 8 million animals and 8 humans 150+ days. That would be a disaster. It would be a Death Barge. Remember, that almost 59,000m³ is a Rectangular Prism. The brown one in images below. That almost 59,000m³ does not account for LOST volume due to “ship”-shaping.

NoahsArk-10-Hlvd
↑↑A comparison of how big Noah’s Ark was compared to how large it had to be for 8 million animals and 8 humans.

NoahsArk-11-Hlvd
↑↑Halfway zoomed away.

NoahsArk-12-Hlvd
↑↑Zoomed out so you can see both.

Your Omniscient God-Thing did not KNOW about simple arithmetic? Also, with biologics, they tend to follow a 85%:15% ratio when comes to volumes. The fewest (15%), largest animals, will consume 85% of the volume.

Thus, even with Noah’s Ark, it would have been barely large enough to care for ONLY the 8 humans, and their livestock. Basically. Every thing else was horrifically, AND purposefully drowned by that Monster of the Holy Bible.

You know. The Miraculous Survivor Thing. Jetliner crashes, killing all but one. You Christinsanes will say that survivor was blessed by your God-Thing. What? Your God-Thing just said, “Fuck the others. I am saving only this one to prove my existence.”? That to me is proof of the Pure Evil of the God-Thing.

[God speaking] “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.”

Right there. “…and create evil”. Your God-Thing, whom names itself JEALOUS, self-confesses to being the Father of ALL Evil.

When it comes to True Truth, I side with what I CAN prove. With Objective Hard Empirical Evidence and FACTs, OHEEF, why would you wish for the fantastical fantasies of the Religitards whom can prove nothing?

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved