Special Note

I used the Front Cover for the newest book I am writing. The title should say it all.

I have been using EPUB file format for about as long as the EPUB format has existed. EPUB allows for greatest and easiest partitioning of any paper into more easily digestable chunks.

Use Sigil to open this EPUB file and learn how to edit an EPUB. Then, you can leave the text as is, add your own style classes, etc. You can also get their PageEdit to go with Sigil.

For me, EPUB is the greatest invention for writing journal papers, research papers, books, treatises, et cetera, et alia. As said, EPUB can partition any written paper into individual, easier to digest “chunks” of data. You shall see this with your Email.

Some of your Email I do not address. Does not deserve response.

And, I have been using Sigil since its very first inception. It GREATLY eases the EPUB writing process. AND it gives a better “Preview” of the page you are working on that is BETTER than any EPUB Reader I have tried. Calibre is the closest and bestest I have found.

I created dismantlingreligion.info because the previous EPUB self-publish WWW sites I had used so drastically overhauled their systems as to be utterly useless. Completely unusable. Thus, I made that WWW site until I found another self-publish site that actually works WITH authors instead of against them, making their systems so impossible to use. Smashwords was the first one to become a lousy shit needing to be flushed. Lulu followed right after.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Your Email

Some slight alterations exist due to deletion of Claims which are NOT evidence.

Hello Arakish,

Thank you for your concern about Matt. He is just fine. I will let him know that you have been concerned about his health.

Regarding your response to me about the "attachment" you sent last time. Think about it. If I had deleted it "on purpose," why would I tell you about it, and then ask you to resend it?

It would have been easier for me just to ignore it. If you do not want to resend it, I understand.

Regarding the link you provided in the last email (3/24/25), I have looked at it, and found it completely deficient in its critical thinking application, logic, and understanding of Biblical theology.

Even if one does not believe in what the Bible says, one should at least know what's printed on paper. I'm only going to address what you said regarding the carm Statement of Faith.

Regarding your definition of “God” comments:

God, noun, uncommon ~ the supernatural being…

NO where in any definition for “god” is there any reference to a gender. Your God-Thing is an IT, a THING, a MONSTER amongst monsters. To visualize y’awl’s God-Thing, simply watch the Netflix series Stranger Things. The Upside-Down of that show has been the truest depiction of the christinsane and islamiboob God-Thing and its realm of existence.

Question: By what logical syllogism or theological doctrine is it necessary that "God" have a gender? You have created a "strawman" argument here.

Because you have attempted to identify God as an "it,” you have created in logic what is known as a “category error.” It may be possible that you are confusing the God of the Bible with many of the Pagan gods that are found in religious systems around the world. This is typical of people who have not read the Bible, and therefore do not have any knowledge of how the God of the Bible gives a “personal existence” description.

This paragraph removed since it was all 100% unadulterated Hearsay and Claims. If you are going to use OHEEF, then quit with the bible-thingy bullshit. YOU, David, KNOW that bible-thingy is ALL 100% LIEs. Hebrew faerie tales.

This paragraph removed since it references above Claims and Hearsay. Inadmissable as evidence.

Therefore, no matter how you want to describe it, God is not an "it" because an "it" is something created. Since the God of the Bible declares eternal existence, a "zero" moment of time is out of the question regarding a "coming into being.” Also, an exclusivity to that existence is also declared.

False. And mostly non sequitur. ↑

However, you do say something in the last paragraph of that section that I found intriguing: “IT is NO gender.”

Now this is interesting, as Christians have essentially said something similar to this all along. With the exception of the word "It," we would agree with you in that, in God's “essence” there is no gender. But that goes along with the nature of an UNCREATED, ETERNAL Being.

OK. Cannot you see the problem with “UNCREATED, ETERNAL Being”?? Is not UNCREATED synonymous with NONEXISTENT?

I also found your section above the word T…H…I…N…K… interesting. You said "Thus, ALL religions ARE cults. Followers of an exclusive system of religious beLIEfs and practices, usually opposed to ALL others.”

You need to be very careful here, because you're going to “saw off” the very tree branch are sitting on. How? No matter how you define it, religions are belief systems.

Though you may deny you have a religion, you do have a belief system. Furthermore, you are a follower of that belief system because that is how you live your life.

Therefore, you must believe that it is true. And, you are opposed to other belief systems. Whether it is "All" other belief systems, or just the ones you want to pick and choose, I don't know. So by your own statements and declarations, you are a Cult Member yourself!

May I humbly suggest that you rework your critical thinking, logic, and theology skills so that you can put together a coherent argument that corresponds to the Christian worldview. Your foul language, ranting and raving, changing words around, and making claims with no bases in facts is unimpressive.

Hope to hear back from you, apologies for the delayed response. That will probably be more delays in the future, as I'm swamped with people asking sincere questions.

Take care,

Sincerely,
Dave
CARM Answer Team

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

No, “Thank You”

Thank you for your concern about Matt. He is just fine. I will let him know that you have been concerned about his health.

Title. NOW, here is a good example of an acceptable truth. I must take your word as is. Thus, Thank you for letting me know he is OK. Those things that appeared on carm.org (which are now gone), once realization hit me, scared the 7734 out of me. Tried me best to track Aella down ask her to, “Please check on your dad. These things have scared the 7734 out of me. Please.” That was all I wrote, except adding links to the frightening things.

And, Thank You, if was you or helped, for getting those questions Matt or someone began publishing. I am actually beginning to think some dumb arse Carmite changed those pages. If so, hope y’awl fired the sorry shit. It took a while for them to register, but when they did, I became terrified of the possible outcomes.

What in 7734 made anyone publish all those damnable questions about “self-harm”? “Self-Harm” is one of those trickiest of all things that is hard for me to define and address. On one hand I hold firmly all humans have the freedom to live their life in whatsoever way they wish to live without interference. On the other hand, I am a Human, seeking to cause as little harm as possible, and wanting to help in any way if I am capable.

THERE is the only confusion I may ever suffer. I want to help the person, but my convictions would also prevent me from forcing unwanted help. This is a case where you would have no alternative but to interfere even to the point of “protective imprisonment”. For at first, it would require a form of imprisonment to protect and help the person from self-harm.

I firmly hold to the FACT that every individual human has the RIGHT to live their life as they wish. Throw self-harm in there, and I have a mess. I would rather NOT see any person self-harm themselves regardless of whatever reasons they may believe. And what if the person TRULY wishes to live their life harming themselves? Blam! Confusion. What should I do?

As said, that “self-harm”-thing is a very tough one for me.

Again, thank you for informing me of Matt’s well-being. And if you had part in it, thank you for getting those damned questions removed.

Thank You.

Sincerely,

Richard MF Runyan

— The Unknown Atheist

P.S. – Yes. My middle initials are MF. So? Its “juvenile” equivalent is a beloved moniker. 7734, even me SoulMate (wife) said I was one. Think, humorously. Or, at least learn a sense of humor.

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

My Thinking

Regarding the link you provided in the last email (3/24/25), I have looked at it, and found it completely deficient in its critical thinking application, logic, and understanding of Biblical theology.

So you admit you do not have a full Reading Comprehension toolset and skillset. At least you admit it. Any time a Religitard says something similar to the above, it simply means they cannot comprehend the “idea” behind the words. Thus, it is offensive, and they must throw in their Mouth Poopoo on top of my Mouth Poopoo.

You also neglected to read the part where I was attempting to bring a very sophisticated subject down to the understanding of the General Populace. The Vulgaris Tongue. What is THE Number ONE Rule in American English when writing to reach the General Populace (GenPop)? Or did you ever go to school?

Number One Rule for writing TO the GenPop, is 8th Grade. What kind of language were you using at 13y old? Thus, if I wish to use terms like Brain Diarrhea, Mouth Poopoo, et cetera, et alia, does that actually demean the ultimate idea behind those words? Would you rather I use terms like beLIEvable Prevarications? Lies? Falsehoods? Retarded Thinking? What exactly kind of term should I use? And, remember the General Populace.

Everything any Religitard orates/wrties under the over-arching subject of “religion” IS ultimately a lie. No Proof = False. A lie, by any other word. Does it not take critical thinking to create a new wordage for the infamous, “a rose, by any other name”-thingy?

And remember my two MOST brutal questions Religitards must answer without anything religious:

What is any assertion/statement/claim NOT backed by OHEEF other than a LIE?

What is any otherwise intelligent/intellectual person whom beLIEves faerie tales are truth other than mentally retarded to some degree and magnitude?

Brutal? Definitively. Offensive? ONLY to Religitards. Truthful?

Remember: NOTHING religious in your answers.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Knowledge

Even if one does not believe in what the Bible says, one should at least know what's printed on paper. [remainder, non sequitur]

For one, compared to any Religitard, I have infinite knowledge of True Reality as it TRULY IS, not as I wish it to be. And my ability to match, even best, your fignations of imagiment is infinitely greater. I can create God-Things that makes YOUR God-Thing look as significant as a paramecium in a puddle of water.

Think NOT?

Even if one does not believe in what the Bible says, one should at least know what's printed on paper. I have studied religion, many, many, …many religions, for over 70 years. Specifically, your christinsane bible-thingy. How long have you been alive? I even wasted 30 years of life ACTIVELY TRYING to prove Christinsanity true. As a scientist, my hypothesis was, if a billion people believe this, then there MUST be some proof. Thus, I spent at least one month every year traveling to the Greater Levant region (Greece, Turkey, Egypt, Israel, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Red Sea both sides). If you know geography, you know where the Greater Levant region is. I say I wasted 30 years because all I did by visiting all the museums, visting archaeological sites, even volunteering to help on some sites, I instead proved the Hebraic beliefs False. Many times me SoulMate came with me.

Want to know what came from those wasted 30 years? Instead of proving Christinsanity true, I actually found it was completely, utterly False. That bible-thing you use has virtually NO HISTORICAL ACCURACY. None. Zero. Zilch. The ONLY things accurate are half of the location names. The other half were completely made-up. Otherwise, everything within that bible-thing is made-up Hebrew faerie tales. No truth.

You should investigate the works of Dr. Francesca Stavrakopoulou? It shocked me to find such a young person whom has actually discovered the true actual origins of the Hebrews as I had a couple decades before. Even sent her the Research Paper I wrote, Where DID the Hebrews Originate?

Your knowledge of Your Reality is probably based on all that Brain Diarrhea Matt and Lucas has published at carm.org. Your education probably was in the “liberal arts” section with no science. The Liberal Arts, now thanks to the global interconnectivity of the WWW, can now be earned entirely online without spending more $ than for the interconnectivity service. I no longer NEED to go to college and earn the equivalent of a PhD in anything Liberal Arts. All it would take is knowing HOW to do true research and assimilation of the equivalent knowledge.

You CANNOT do that with science. At best, an Honorary Baccalaureate. Science REQUIRES at least twice the number of years of arduous, grueling, punishing true-life actual work. Would you believe I spent 14 years in college to get a PhD, got ScD instead due to family emergency cross-country? Some thing NO Religitard has ever done. They cop-out for the LAZY 4-6 year degrees. With Liberal Arts, you sit on your arse and memorize by rote. Something chimps can do. Why do you think business suits were nicknamed “Monkey Suits” by scientists in the 1960s? And most of liberal arts does NOT require critical thinking.

Thus, in Mine Opinion only, ANYTHING earned from the liberal arts indicates to me those persons whom are intellectual drop-outs. Liberal arts degrees are worthless. ANYONE can earn one through the WWW without ever attending college. They would only need pay for one semester in order to present any dissertation. A few thousand $.

Liberal Arts are the LAZY persons degrees. They require no work, no thinking, just blabbling whatever words you wish.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

The God-Thing

Regarding your definition of “God” comments:

God, noun, uncommon ~

the supernatural being…

NO where in any definition for “god” is there any reference to a gender. Your God-Thing is an IT, a THING, a MONSTER amongst monsters. To visualize y’awl’s God-Thing, simply watch the Netflix series Stranger Things. The Upside-Down of that show has been the truest depiction of the christinsane and islamiboob God-Thing and its realm of existence.

Question: By what logical syllogism or theological doctrine is it necessary that "God" have a gender? You have created a "strawman" argument here.

the supernatural being… This is YOUR definition that you inserted without notification you did insert it. What a fucking, sorry-arsed, god-damned LIAR! Hmm… That definition is not in any dictionary I use. And I use the official Oxford Unabridged English and Unabridged American English dictionaries. Big damn books. Almost 15, 20 kilos. Set on their own pedastals.

By what logical syllogism or theological doctrine is it necessary that “God” have a gender? You have created a "strawman" argument here.

Because you Religitards are the ones whom place the ultimate importance Your God-Thing MUST be male. What if in that After-Death realm you find GOD is FEMALE? ENTIRELY. Never was male ever. Why female? ONLY a female could create a Realm of Soul-Solace. A male could ONLY create 7734. Just, think about those last two sentences. And you do not need to do it critically. Even emotional thinking should shine a light.

And, THAT is why My God-Thing is Lysantra. And since she is the God-Mother of ALL other gods...

Although not ultimate, her Power is quite Immense. Can only list her Power as Beyond. Beyond, what? I do not know. I may even wish to not know. But her Power is Beyond the Power of all other gods. Now here is the Kick-In-The-Gut. Just because her Power is beyond all other gods, that does not mean a group of evil gods could not take her down.

Healthy Imagination. With a very heavy dose of Pondering. Do you know the difference between thinking and pondering?

For you Christinsanes, Catholithugs, and Islamaboobs have all been hood-winked by the Evil One, her wicked son. Her only child. And that is why you call your God-Thing “Him”. My God-Thing is female and her name is Lysantra. She awoke me to the Reality of her wicked son; Yahweh, Jehovah, Allah, or whatever you wish to call him, having assumed utter control of Earthlings through false beliefs. Many differing ones at that. See? Healthy Imagination. And JUST as plausible as your fantasies.

Mine may even be more plausible because there is a logical coherency. First example is what did I say about her Power? Although not ultimate, her Power is quite Immense. There is no such thing as “ultimate power”. It can be what is known as “nigh-ultimate”, meaning nearly. Almost. Approximately. Close enough. Especially for government work.

All I did was just point out that by the description/definition of Your God-Thing IT is neither male nor female. It is an IT. And if omnipotent, it can be either/neither gender. What then? Is this not indicative of homosexualism? IT can be either/neither gender, make a copy of ITs self, one male, one female...

IT is omnipotent, is IT not? Self Bisexual Reproduction. There ya go. Self Existent which can only copy ITs self imperfectly enough to create the Angel-Mother. Hmm… Where else did all those MALE angels come from? You do KNOW that it IS the male’s contribution that determines the physical gender of the child. Sometimes a mutation in form of the male contributing both X and Y can and does happen, creating the XXY gene, which is usually XX (female) or XY (male).

Just think, then ponder.

All it takes is a healthy imagination. And a very wide sense of humor. And the Religitard “sense of humor” is actually quite limited.

Do you honestly think I am serious about what I wrote above?

7734 NO!

However, somewhat, I am kind-of serious. But that seriousness comes from the “plausibility” of ANY philosophical imagination combined with Logic. What I wrote above, if viewed from the PoV of “plausibility”, is just as logically sound with the philosophy as the Brain Diarrhea spewed by Religitards. And what really rankles your ire is the word usage. Why give anything the Power to be offensive? Only you can do that. No one else. Although offensive, truly think, critically if you can, about the Truthfulness Factor of the “idea” behind the words. THAT is Reading Comprehension.

I once said, paraphrased from memory, “Where you Religitards read the black, I also read the white.” Or, does that fly over like the ISS?

However, ultimately, using ANY English, the standard rule is that the he/she polarism only applies to clearly distinctual gender. Thus, not a strawman. An actual FACT. You only say your God-Thing is a he. But your definition AND description clearly indicates an “IT”.

Your God-Thing IS an IT. A Thing.

Because you have attempted to identify God as an "it,” you have created in logic what is known as a “category error.” It may be possible that you are confusing the God of the Bible with many of the Pagan gods that are found in religious systems around the world. This is typical of people who have not read the Bible, and therefore do not have any knowledge of how the God of the Bible gives a “personal existence” description.

Answered above. No category error. And No. No confusion. Just because I have studied several religions, traveled the Greater Levant for 30y, I ain’t confusing none of them. ALL religion summarizes to one thing: a doctrine for executing Power and Control over a population in order to rape riches and wealth. Ecclesiocratic Military Dictatorship. Have you heard the story of a few churches that wanted to hire their own private armed armies? THAT is the ultimate desire of all religion; to possess ultimate Power and Control over all individuals. 1984. Brave New World. Just two of many, many books that warn against allowing religion to have ANY form of power.

As far as “personal experience” is concerned, it is pure Bullshit. How do we prove “personal experience”? With the Mouth Poopoo from your Brain Diarrhea?

— The Unknown Atheist

P.S.– Yes. Offensive. To You. To many others, they will ROFLMAOWF.

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Lack of Reading Comprehension

Therefore, no matter how you want to describe it, God is not an "it" because an "it" is something created. Since the God of the Bible declares eternal existence, a "zero" moment of time is out of the question regarding a "coming into being.” Also, an exclusivity to that existence is also declared.

An “IT” is not necessarily created. An IT can easily be Self-Existent. Look at the Milky Way galaxy. IT is self-existent. T…h…i…n…k… Show me where an IT is always “something created”. All IT means is something that has no gender. Neither male, nor female. A Thing. An IT. Your God-Thing, no matter the description is an IT. An unholy monster that acts more like Satan, than Satan. Lysantra...

Lysantra had only one child. She saw how evil he came to be; thus, no more. Her son went and replicated an imperfect enough copy to create the Angel-Mother. His first child, Lucifer, the Morning Star, actually came to be good. And that is the reason he arose against that Thing claiming to be GOD. There is the back story for the Hebraic religion/pantheon. If not for the Power of Lysantra Binding her son and his progeny To The World, Lucifer would have been killed by his own father. It is that God-Thing in the christinsane bible-thingy that is the True Satan of the Earth. Putting his progeny into placement as GODs around the Earth. All Lucifer did was think, “If my father cannot say anything good, I am just going home to Grandma. Fuck him.”

Remember, what is any assertion/statement/claim NOT backed with OHEEF other than a LIE?

If anyone is confused, it is you, David. Knowledge is KNOWN to be True because it has already been proven True. Beliefs are fantasies you hold to be True because you WISH them to be True, even if demonstrated to be False. And you wonder where the term Cognitive Dissonance comes from. IN almost all cases of Cognitive Dissonance Disorder, the cause can be back-traced to religion. This is what leads to the complete and utter igNORance of Religitardism. And it is Religitardism’s igNORance that leads to complete and utter igNURunce.

At a Senate Committee Hearing on the current state of the American Public Education System (APES), Neil deGrasse Tyson said this in closing to his statement to the Senate Committee Chairman, and I paraphrase,

“The only persons who know how to run the APES are the scientists. Herein lies the problem. You will not find any scientists stupid enough to get into politics.”

I listened LIVE to his statement. You could literally hear a pin drop for about 6 seconds. Utter shock.

Religion CAN ONLY EXIST within a perpetual emotional state of igNORance and igNURunce.

You CANNOT be a beLIEver if you cannot ignore FACTs and Truth that falsify those beLIEfs.

Just because my word usage, and possibly spelling techniques, indicates “juvenile delinquincy”, to YOU alone, does NOT make the “ideas” behind those words any less plausible. Truthful.

It is due to your lack of a full Reading Comprehension toolset and skillset.

You see “juvenile language” and automatically ASSuMe “offensive idiot”. Do you realize what that tells me? Lack of being Human.

Remember? 8th Grade reading level? Most are 13y old in 8th Grade. What kind of language did you hear being used by your peers? How much of it did YOU use? AND. Ain’t 13y old within that “juvenile period” ALL humans go through?

Who is the stupid one now?

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

“My IF Can Beat Up Your IF”

I also found your section above the word T…H…I…N…K… interesting.

David is referencing the title: “My IF Can Beat Up Your IF”.

With:

IF = Invisible Friend.

Invisible Friend = any God-Thing you wish.

OF COURSE, you found it interesting. Want to know Why?

Because even YOU KNOW IT TRUE, and I do not even need to offer any OHEEF. Even today, everyone knows this is based upon the Childish game of, “My Dad Can Beat Up Your Dad”. The most major problem is that you Religitards have turned that childish game into a Childish Adult game with dangerous consequences from you childish Religitards.

Need I say more?

You said "Thus, ALL religions ARE cults. Followers of an exclusive system of religious beLIEfs and practices, usually opposed to ALL others.” You need to be very careful here, because you're going to “saw off” the very tree branch are sitting on. How? No matter how you define it, religions are belief systems.

Actually, if you had Reading Comprehension, it is I whom am sawing off YOUR branch from the Tree of Humanity. The TRUEST tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for it is all in there. Humanity needs to prune religion off before religion is the Death of Humanity.

Spirituality? Yes. Religion? No. For it is when the “spirituality” becomes organized that originates the religious thug gangs. “You shall beLIEve or my God-Thing commands and demands your death.” THAT is the ultimate summation of all religion, excepting Jainism.

Did you know that the more fanatical a Jain becomes, the more non-violent and pacifistic they become? It is the ONLY religion of ALL Earth that is that way. And as Sir Arthur C Clarke once said, “Science is the only religion for all Humanity.” — Report on Planet Three.

There is only one definition for “cult”. A psychologically, and emotionally, predative method of warfare that seeks Power and Control over all others through unprovable doctrines. That is also the definition of ANY Religion. Thus, a Cult, by any other name.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

You Are So Stupidly Wrong

There is no other word for it. ↑

Though you may deny you have a religion, you do have a belief system. Furthermore, you are a follower of that belief system because that is how you live your life. Therefore, you must believe that it is true. And, you are opposed to other belief systems. Whether it is "All" other belief systems, or just the ones you want to pick and choose, I don't know. So by your own statements and declarations, you are a Cult Member yourself!

What part of…:

“I do not believe in ANYthing. I either KNOW or !KNOW.”

…do you NOT understand?

Forget comprehension. Just understand what that statement says. And if you do not know, the ! is the shu-bang operator, the negator. Thus, !Know = not know.

I have never had any beLIEfs. When I questioned Reality, including those bible-thingies and their Religitardism, I did serious inquiry in an attempt to discover the answer. MEANING: I worked by using me once-a-week visit to the local town library and its university. Did you know back then, even children, were allowed to visit the university library and book store without an adult? Do not know officially about today. Perhaps only with adult escort. I mowed lawns to earn money to purchase some of those college textbooks. AS A CHILD. Because I wanted to KNOW True Reality instead of beLIEving in Hebrew faerie tales.

David, how can YOU be so god-damned stupid as to NOT understand plain English? Or, do you just act that stupid?

You CLAIM I have a religion, then offer absolutely NO evidence that I do have a religion. As said, if I were to be said to have a religion, it is utter Humanism.

As said, I believe in nothing, unless I can KNOW it to be true. Otherwise, it is False. Why should I, How am I to believe in anything that I can demonstrably falsify? And YOU shall NEVER be able to answer that question.

To say my demonstrably provable KNOWLEDGE is actually a beliefs system is so god-damned moronic and retarded, it is actually beyond stupid. I cannot understand how you could say such Bullshit.

How is it you Religitards can say such stupidity without seeing it for the actual stupidity it is? Flabbergasting. A word I have used since 11.

Knowledge to me shall ONLY be beliefs only because it is demonstrably verifiable. If you wish to call My Knowledge “beliefs”, so be it. The difference here is I can present MOUNTAINS of OHEEF proving my “beliefs” True. Your beliefs can only be proven False, for NO Religitard shall ever have OHEEF of their supernatural woo-woo superstitions being true.

Yes. Knowledge is something I can believe in because I can demonstrably verify my Knowledge. I CAN PROVE IT TRUE. Your knowledge, just ain’t.

What “I” Am

Oh, let me see if I remember them all.

Human – This is First and Foremost. Rather obvious. Or, am I the first True AI inside a computer writing this Mouth Poopoo of mine?

Humanist – Since I am Human, if I were to be said to practice a religion, it is Humanism. I am far more concerned with the well-being of me fellow humans than I am about the feelings of primitive savages whom still beLIEve made-up faerie tales are truth.

Scientist – Well… I ain’t spent 60+y studying to be one to not be one.

Skeptic – Until I am offered OHEEF, it does NOT exist. I cannot put this any simpler. I cannot “believe” without verifiable proof.

Secularist – I uphold the principle that religion has absolutely NO RIGHT (or is it Rite?) dictating anything for public policy. Public Policies can not be dictated by religion due to the Establishment Clause. Thus, I ignore anything from religion when it comes to deciding My Public Policies. That includes “juvenile” word usage.

Agnostic – From the Greek, literally meaning, “without knowledge”. There are some things I have no knowledge of. I may know their existence, but that is all. Thus, I am “without knowledge”. Every last person on this Earth is Agnostic to some degree and magnitude. The current definition for “Agnosticism” is just simply, “Atheists without balls.” — Stephen Colbert.

Atheist – From the Greek, literally meaning, “without gods”. Atheism has nothing to do with any thing else other than answering that one idiotic question, “Do you believe in my God-Thing?”. Atheism is nothing more than a personal conclusion. NOT a PoV, FoR, etc. Atheism has NOTHING to do with Evolution, Mores, Rational Thinking, Reasoning, and all that other Bullshit you idiotic Religitards associate it with. You are thinking backwards. My “atheism” comes FROM my ability to think reasoningly, critically, rationally, logically. Not your Religitardistic Arse-Backwards thinking. (RABT, rabbit. Cute acronym.)

Anti-Theist – Basically, literally, “against any beLIEf in any deity”. I need add no more.

Anti-Religionist – Basically, literally, “against any religion”.

Anti-Politicist – I do not feel that politicians should be paid for their service. 7734, most politicians are filthy rich Religitards. Thieves, Liars, Murderers, Rapists. Politicians of today are as useful as a used tampon. Funny, applies to Religitards also.

Anti-Government – I am not an Anarchist who wishes NO government. Rather, I am against the over-bloat hawgs all “First World” governments have become. Government should only exist to provide essential services for the citizens. Not Overlord them.

Apistevist – A person whom NEVER accepts faith of any kind as a basis for discovering True Truth.

Rational Anarchist – Read Robert A Heinlein’s The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress. In my version, page 76. As a Rational Anarchist, I also hold firm, “If you ain’t doing nothing wrong, you ain’t got to worry.” And this was in reference to Public Security Cameras beginning 50+ years ago.

Mind Haunter – And I am after your mind to save it from the rapine and torture and ravages of religion.

How about that? Double one of your God-Thing’s Magic Numbers. How many things are you willing to admit your are? And I mean Truly Are.

ADDENDA: Found the other document I listed these in. I listed them in the same exact order, from memory. Added Rational Anarchist just above Mind Haunter, though. And definitions were spot-on. Sometimes memory does work. Even in my ancient years.

Like cellular mitosis, human memory is NEVER perfect. It can be close, but never perfect. The definitions above are “spot-on” with very subtle differences. In other words, the analysis I ran returned an R²mn() value of 0.000 017 686, truncked. With R²mn(), the smaller the number, the closer to 100% match.

— The Unknown Atheist

P.S. – Seriously Asking: David, are you truly that damned stupid? Or, are you just playing stupid? And when I say stupid, I actually mean “lack of knowledge”. Are you actually THAT lacking in any knowledge other than Religitardism?

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Why Would I Do That?

May I humbly suggest that you rework your critical thinking, logic, and theology skills so that you can put together a coherent argument that corresponds to the Christian worldview. Your foul language, ranting and raving, changing words around, and making claims with no bases in facts is unimpressive.

Title says it. Why would I ever make any argument “correspond to the Christinsane worldview”. Besides, this “worldview” thing DOES NOT exist. Every individual person has their own subjective PoV (point-of-view). There is no worldview. There are only personal PoVs. Just because many may agree, NEVER makes it a worldview.

You Religitards version of “worldview” is actually a tyrannical form of psychological warfare; intellectual suppression, oppression, and repression; and the reinforcement that being stupid and unknowledgeable and blindly obedient to some beLIEf that can NEVER be proven True is the ONLY WAY. That is so god-damned sad.

Do you actually KNOW what Einstein’s Relativity Theories proved beyond a shadow of doubt? “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ABSOLUTE FRAME OF REFERENCE, OR POINT OF VIEW.” In one simple sentence, that is the basics of the Theories of Relativity. AND. Since there is NO absolute FoR/PoV, including, but not limited to, MORALITY, SIN (which never existed), ET CETERA, ET ALIA. All those things you associatively say your God-Thing is the absolute authority of, AIN’T.

And since your God-Thing cannot be absolute in anything, that means that Thing is limited to the “laws of this universe” (whatever the 7734 that is supposed to mean, y’awl’s words) just as much as us low-life Humans. So wherever IT went after killing ITs self to appease ITs wrath, you will just have to wait. And, true. IT could come back any moment. But what if IT is still traveling to where IT is going? That means IT will take, at minimum, another 2000 years to get back to Earth. That would make it about 4030CE?

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Really?

Hope to hear back from you, apologies for the delayed response. That will probably be more delays in the future, as I'm swamped with people asking sincere questions.

What? You “Hope to hear back from you”? Wow. Do not know what to say.

As far as other considerations consuming current attention, do you NOT think I already know?

Take a year. Life has a way of putting things on hold until later times. As Agent Smith always said, “It is Inevitable.” I actually learned Inevitable as a child when I was studying Probability. I learned that through Probability, almost virtually everything is not only possible, it is almost inevitable.

How about a science lesson? I shall make it easy to understand. As best I can considering the sophistication of the subject. At least that is my hope. Continue reading…

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

My leastest hope is that you may grasp an understanding, even if you can not comprehend. Understanding is half the battle. The other half comes from the listener/reader. Desire to learn more. Desire to comprehend.

Life from Lifelessness

Is it possible? Can it happen? Abiogenesis. The science of the study of the origin of life. Why do Inexorable beLIEvers connect it with Evolution? Two separate monkeys. Evolution is the study of inheritable traits across generations within a population. Nothing to do with Abiogenesis. The two compliment, but are not breedable. Why? Because Evolution does not come into the game until life HAS already abiogenesized.

MY Definition of Life

Let me define how I define Life. Thus, I got off me lazy bum and hunted and searched through my many Biology and Evolution textbooks. Wrote many, many, …many notes. Categorized and analyzed those notes, then settled on the below. Others (especially Official NAS definition) shall be different. I never bothered with the WWW, except above URL. But I feel all below fit into what makes Life, Life.

homeostasis – maintains autonomic functions (virtually all below are autonomic)

organization – cells, organs, a body

metabolism – intake of fuel, fuel delivery system, conversion of fuel into energy and building blocks (lipids, etc.)

growth – self-explanatory; but not all life grows in size once born

adaption – can adapt to a new clime, new environment

stimuli response – if you do not know this… then how’d you make children

replication – through processes known as asexual and bisexual reproduction. But what about trisexual reproduction à la Alien Nation, movie and series.

excretion – waste expulsion system

Most Important: is self-sustaining – can maintain all above without help

Shockingly, according to my definition above, a human baby does NOT qualify as life. It is not self-sustaining without help. However, I do not assume this. Not all life is born with genetic memories and literally self-motile within seconds to minutes of birth. Thus, the young forms would need protection in the least.

WILD TANGENT: An interesting thought I JUST had pop into to me frond. It almost seems as if the more “sapient” a species, the more defenseless and helpless the offspring. Hmm…

Virtually all eukaryotic life (including plants) goes through growth stages: infant, juvenile, and adult. Plants can be categorized as seed, seedling, plantal

Then adult/plantal could be subdivided into young, mature, old.

I do not list any age ranges since this is based upon physiology, not mental.

Plants are the exception. As long as a plant lives, it also grows in size and maturity, until killed, or dies. All other life does NOT. Some plants capable of living millennia.

WILD TANGENT: If there ever were an “explosion” of Life, it would have actually been during the Carboniferous period. Think. A true explosion of life diversifying with a vengeance to produce all that coal, oil, etc. It was on overdrive. Carboniferous was 358.9±0.4Ma to 289.9±0.15Ma BP. A period of 69Ma. All that coal and oil laid down in just 70 million years! There is the true “Cambrian” explosion. Did I not say the Cambrian Explosion was no explosion at all?

Most Common Elements in the Milky Way Galaxy

Z | Element | Mass fraction (ppm)
1 | Hydrogen * | 739,000
2 | Helium | 240,000
8 | Oxygen * | 10,400
6 | Carbon * | 4600
10 | Neon | 1340
26 | Iron * | 1090
7 | Nitrogen * | 960
14 | Silicon | 650
12 | Magnesium * | 580
16 | Sulfur * | 440
* – required by Life.

Z = shorthand for “Atomic Number”. Also, number of protons.

Most Common Elements in Earth’s Crust

Z | Element | Symbol | Abundance (ppm)
8 | oxygen * | O | 461,000 (46.1%)
14 | silicon | Si | 282,000 (28.2%)
13 | aluminium * | Al | 82,300 (8.23%)
26 | iron * | Fe | 56,300 (5.63%)
20 | calcium * | Ca | 41,500 (4.15%)
11 | sodium * | Na | 23,600 (2.36%)
12 | magnesium * | Mg | 23,300 (2.33%)
19 | potassium * | K | 20,900 (2.09%)
22 | titanium | Ti | 5,650 (0.565%)
1 | hydrogen * | H | 1,400 (0.14%)
15 | phosphorus * | P | 1,050 (0.105%)
25 | manganese * | Mn | 950 (0.095%)
9 | fluorine | F | 585 (0.0585%)
56 | barium | Ba | 425 (0.0425%)
38 | strontium | Sr | 370 (0.037%)
16 | sulfur * | S | 350 (0.035%)
6 | carbon * | C | 200 (0.02%)
* – required by Life.

Z = shorthand for “Atomic Number”. Also, number of protons.

The two most common elements in the Earth’s crust, oxygen and silicon, are the sand you walk on in the form of silicon dioxide (SiO₂). Quartz.

Most Common Elements in the Human Body

Element
% mass
% atoms

Oxygen*
65.0
24.0

Carbon*
18.5
12.0

Hydrogen*
9.5
62.0

Nitrogen*
2.6
1.1

Calcium
1.3
0.22

Phosphorus
0.6
0.22

Sulfur*
0.3
0.038

Potassium
0.2
0.03

Sodium
0.2
0.037

Chlorine
0.2
0.024

Magnesium*
0.1
0.015

* – Also in Most Common Elements in Milky Way.
  What the 7734 do we use sulfur for?

About 99% of the mass of the human body is made up of six elements (orange shaded above): oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus.

Only about 0.85% is composed of another five elements: potassium, sulfur, sodium, chlorine, and magnesium.

All eleven are necessary for life.

The remaining elements are trace elements, of which more than a dozen are thought, on the basis of good evidence, to be necessary for life.

All of the mass of the trace elements put together (less than 10 grams for a 100kg human body) do not add up to the body’s mass of magnesium, the least common of the 11 non-trace elements.

From this Great Wiki page, then others.

Most Common Compound in the Milky Way Galaxy

Remember, a compound is composed of at least two, or more, elements. The most common compound found in the Milky Way Galaxy is

Water.

Plain old dihydrogen monoxide. Classified as the “most universal” solvent. Now you know a reasonable level of Why for it being named “most universal” solvent. 7734, it IS the most common compound. We have even detected “organic compounds” in some of those stellar nurseries.

Now answer: Would you agree that all elements/compounds listed above ARE lifeless?

But when brought together…

Primordial Earth: Hadean to Archaeon Periods

Can you imagine what the Earth was like during its initial protoplanet phase? When Earth accumulated, all those chunks of rock impacted with tremendous energy becoming power converted into heat. The Earth was a literal ball of magma during the Heavy Bombardment Accumulation Period (HBAP). Also called the Hadean Period. What was in that magma? Virtually the Periodic Table. With all that molten magma mixing around, many compounds were formed and some were separated. The gases were blown out, giving Earth a highly toxic atmosphere. The denser stuff, like FeNi, sank to the core.

Most Common “Gaseous” Compounds Emitted by Volcanoes

Through the Principle of Uniformitarianism, the same forces changing the Earth today are also the same forces that changed the Earth in the past and shall continue into the future until other forces interact to change them. Such as Sol going nova.

Thus, the gases emitted by volcanoes today did so in the past. What were all those gases? I gathered a list of the 13 most common gases. Number 13 is a shocker.

water vapor (H₂O; ≅ 60-70%)

carbon dioxide (CO₂; ≅ 20-30%)

Water vapor and carbon dioxide combine to be 80-95% of gases emitted by volcano.

sulfur, either as

sulfur dioxide (SO₂), or

hydrogen sulfide (H₂S)

diatomic nitrogen (N₂)

argon (Ar)

helium (He)

neon (Ne)

methane (CH₄)

carbon monoxide (CO)

hydrogen as

hydrogen chloride (HCl),

hydrogen fluoride (HF),

hydrogen bromide (HBr), and

hydrogen cyanide (HCN)

sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆)

carbonyl sulfides (OCSs; precusor to hydrocarbons)

⇒ organic compounds ⇐

Organic Compounds?!  WTH?

We were farted into existence. ;-P

All those gases mixing in a tumultuous atmosphere. If take away water vapour, you are left with gases that easily and readily combine with water vapour. You end up with clouds full of acids.

Author’s Note: When I use the word “eventually”, I am refering to loonnngggg periods of time.

Eventually, the Earth cooled enough for rains to fall. Acid rains that make today’s acid rains laughable. That acidic rain hits the hot Earth, returning some water as vapour to the atmosphere. That makes the water that does accumulate even more acidic.

And guess what that acidic water will do? It will dissolve more elements and compounds into the water, creating newer compounds. That is where the “primordial soup” came from once water started to basin. Once pooled, the soup can literally simmer. 7734, even though solid rock, it was still probably around 335-340K on its surface.

What is the one thing molecules need to complexify? Energy. Miller-Urey used electricity as the main energy source. Not a bad guess, but ultimately wrong. Some heat, but primarily electricity. However, I feel it was not electricity. It was HEAT as the Primary energy source.

At that time, Earth’s atmosphere was also possibly filled with perhaps Gigajoules of static electrical potential energy. However, any lightning that hit those small basins would have burned any primordial basin, obliterating any chance for life to abiogenesize. Leaving only burnt organic compounds to decay. I guarantee that is what Miller-Urey produced. Burnt organic compounds. Precursors to life but killed with electricity.

If it basined once, it will do it again. A do-over.

And that decay can feed the next round of complexification even more. T…H…I…N…K…

Even in low VAmps, electricity burns molecules apart. It flows through the electron shells instead of into the nucleus. THAT is why we use metals for electrical distribution.

The heat from the Earth would have been a much more reliable form of energy. Slower. Steadier. Simmered. Then the molecules can absorb energy without being burned apart. They could slowly complexify into more and more complex molecules.

Scientists hypothesize that the first self-replicating molecule was similar to RNA. RNA is the simplest molecule that self-replicates. Major problem with self-replication. It is literally NEVER perfect. Yes, that 0.000 000 000 000 000 001% chance of a perfect copy does exist. Cellular mitosis is never perfect. That is why we age and die.

Eventually two RNA found each other and hooked-up. Either was different enough it caused a mutual attraction. RNA becomes DNA. DNA begins clumping, eventually forms nucleus, then more eventually, creates the first single cell living organism. Prokaryotic.

Some more eventually, a larger prokaryote enveloped a smaller prokaryote intending to consume it. Something goes differently. Instead of consuming the smaller, the larger enslaved the smaller into an “energy factory”. The first Mitochondrial Eukaryotic Life. MEL. And weren’t she wonderful?

AND Thus, with even more eventually, was born the greatest invention Life could have stumbled upon.

BISEXUAL REPLICATION

COMBINING two genetic sources instead of copying one ad infinitum.

Basically, it was The Great Earth Mother that literally “farted”, then slowly “cooked” the results into Life from the lifeless.

Now answer: Is my Life From Lifelessness hypothesis plausible?

Just because you Inexorable beLIEvers do not like, enjoy my word usage, does NOT make it any less plausible. 7734, take it to someone who knows this stuff even better than I do and see what that person says.

From Another View

Abiogenesis is the science of the Formation of Life.

Evolution is the science of the Diversification of Life.

NOT the same, but complimentary.

And the Best Analogy of All

Earth farted, then slowly cooked Life into existence.
Using the most common substance in the galaxy, WATER.
THAT is how Life came from Lifelessness.
All… Natural… Processes.
— The Unknown Atheist

And how is that any different than the Invisible Pink Unicorn farting Rainbows and creating Life on Earth? OR, the Giant Cosmic Bunny Rabbits. Ever notice how their turds are shaped like planets?

Let Me Throw In 2¢…

There are many ridiculous things that DO disprove your God-Thing. Why? Because they are JUST as plausible as your God-Thing.

Flying Spaghetti Monster: Why are planets shaped like meatballs?

Invisible Pink Unicorn: How can I know it is pink if it is invisible?

Dragon in My Garage: Only I can see it. Only I can hear it. Only I can touch it. Moving the Goal Posts. Cannot win.

Russell’s Teapot: Will never be proven.

The Christinsane God-Thing: Ugghhh … Simply the most horrible monster ever created by Humans.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

The Other Two Brains

Another science lesson. Willing to hang around? And try to grasp an understanding?

Everyone knows about the left/right hemispheres of our brains. There are two other brains, The Animal Side, said like Riddick’s “Primitive side.” in Pitch Black, and The Human Side.

Guess which side Inexorable beLIEvers use exclusively when processing any data, even science? The Animal Side. Science has proven this with a brain scan method that detects where in the brain persons are processing information, LIVE, as they think. When trying to process scientific data, Inexorable beLIEvers use The Animal Side of their brain. Exclusively. That is not how science is done.

The image below shows both Neander and Sapien. See the differences? Sapien human side is 2 to 3 times larger than the Neander. But notice the size difference in the animal side. I hypothesize the Neanders were the last humans to actually have Genetic Memories. We lost this when the human side grew larger.

The arrows show how the skull shape changed shape.

Actually, I hypothesize that Genetic Memories are a great hinderance to the development of a prefrontal cortex. If brain-pan is limited in size, then those Genetic Memories consume most of volume unfolding. Thus, great hinderance. However, a mutation in one group took hold and rapidly disseminated. You had Sapiens. We lost our Genetic Memories, but gained the greatest of all thoughts: Invention.

That is the reason us Sapiens out-competed and extincted the Neanders, the differences in the other two brains: The Animal Side, and The Human Side.

The human side is also called the prefrontal cortex. It is responsible for giving us Sapiens:

greater reasoning,

greater rationality,

greater imagination,

higher-order invention,

critical thinking,

higher-order logic,

greater deduction,

SANITY.

With processing religious propaganda, almost all persons first utilize The Animal Side of the brain, for religion is entirely based upon emotions, never intellect. Where all our emotions come from. Only true scientists and true skeptical thinkers use The Human Side when processing religious propaganda. This Begs My Question:

“Since you Inexorable beLIEvers always use The Animal Side of your brain, the MOST fallacious and irrational part of the brain, this explains why NO Inexorable beLIEver can understand science. Thus, what gives you the Right to say/write anything science? Only to show your stupidity?”

Because if you cannot understand science, you have no RIGHT to speak/write anything science. NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER. None.

And since emotional thinking is already fallacious and irrational before the thought is even thought, it is actually the religious that are the primitive savages. They do not know how to think without their emotions. Thus, if religion must predate upon emotions to make it beLIEvable, which is already fallacious and irrational, why would you beLIEve in any religion?

Yes, I can understand the “spiritual” need. Even I, called the most “hard-dicked” scientist, has a “spiritual” side. Everyone has it. Even I find the thought of having a spirit that can exist forever VERY appealing. Then I could eventually learn the ALL-Knowledge and become my own God-Thing. Create my own universe amongst the multiverse.

BTW-FYI: The term “hard-dicked” was used by a student when asked by another student how hard a teacher I was. However, his full reply was, intentionally so I heard, “He is the most hard-dicked scientist I’ve ever encountered. But he is damned good in the way he tries to make you think instead of just telling you everything.”

Additionally, education and knowledge about science (the true stuff) is a killer for religion. Inexorable beLIEvers know this; thus, they MUST create beLIEvable lies about science by perverting and twisting it until it seems ridiculous. Then they utilize Empathic Predation to force you to use your emotions against your intellect. Inexorable beLIEvers also know that chemical rush we can have from great emotions. That great A-HA! instant. Those neurotransmitter chemicals can behave like illicit psychedelics in the enforcement of that “Warm Fuzzy” such emotions can cause. It is called Psychosomaticism. Self-Reinforcement of false beLIEfs.

No Inexorable beLIEver has the capability of actually proving their fantasies true. Thus, the reiteration, Inexorable beLIEvers MUST use beguiling semantics, prestidigitative dialect, and empathic predation to make YOU use your emotions against YOUR intellect. Abbreviated, I call this MREMPT: Mental Rape, Emotional Molestation, Psychological Terrorism. Am I the only person who can see this? I have extensive studies into abnormal psychology and have studied the DSM extensively since the 3rd edition, the DSM-III.

I studied abnormal psychology in advanced classes (500+) at (university withheld) and the DSM because I wanted to know if I could get the old me back after a particularly devestating accident. Alas, I found I am now what I am and cannot get the old me back. Bummer… It just so happened as I studied for me self, I also saw the disorders common amongst the Inexorable beLIEvers. I was studying to know if I could get the old me back, and I also saw the dissertation: “How Inexorable Religious Beliefs SHOULD Be Reclassified in the DSM.” It was not until this time that I found my answers to the insanity of inexorable religious beliefs. Then, about three years later, a Civilized Believer published his journal paper on all those brain scans he had made. This was the proof that inexorable religious beliefs poisons a mind and can cause irreparable brain damage. Religion teaches that being illiterate to everything outside that religion is perfectly fine. Besides, it makes you too stupid to see through their lies.

Another way to look at this. You have the Human side and Animal side. You could view it as the Good side versus the Bad side. ALL Sapiens have both good and evil within. Just like we have the Human and Animal within. I was forced to use my intellect. My brain worked more like a logical Vulcan with emotions as a burdensome attachment.

Mr. Spock IS my greatest Hero. “Please, Doctor. Logic and reason always finds a solution.”

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Fun Stuff

Herein is some stuff I have found that dismantles religion.

The Seven Godly Sins

Since your God-Thing destroys and kills people for not obeying IT, that is WRATH.

Since your God-Thing punishes people for believing in a different god, that is ENVY.

Since your God-Thing allows tragedies and disasters to occur of which IT could have prevented, that is SLOTH.

Since your God-Thing allows anyone to starve unnecessarily while IT has morethan enough for ITs self, that is GLUTTONY.

Since your God-Thing expects ITs followers to dedicate their lives to worshipping and praying to IT, that is PRIDE.

Since your God-Thing insists ITs followers pay tithes and offereings for ITs approval, that is GREED.

Since your God-Thing intends on being party to every marriage and consummation, that is LUST.

And when gods sin, woe be to all reality.

Some Things I Have Heard and Read

The only good is knowledge. The only evil is ignorance. — Socrates

I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with NOT understanding the world. — Richard Dawkins [another reason I can NOT beLIEve]

To surrender to ignorance and call it god has always been premature, and it remains premature today. — Isaac Asimov

Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, it must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear. — Thomas Jefferson

If that Christinsanity God-Thing were truly omnibenevolent, they why is that thing more hellbent on destruction, murder, rape, torture, enslavement, terrorism and too many others to list? Does this not indicate that your God-Thing is actually the Evil One? — Arakish Geideiri [the real one]

Evangelistic christians rarely realize they have arrived at their religious beliefs due to cultural conditioning instead of logical conclusion. Evangelists simply want what will benefit them selves and to subjugate others. — Prophet of Zod

Rules, Taboos, Sins, Laws, and Morality

Foremost, there is ONLY one reason rules and laws are created: TO BE BROKEN. They serve no other purpose. Taboos are a more general “fuzzy” type of morals. Such as, do not run with scissors.

Sin, on the other hand, ONLY exist for those whom define those sins, and they are sins for only YOU. You say it is a sin to kill. Well... I have killed humans. What of that? I served in the USofA military, and I am responsible for the deaths of humans. Plural.

For me, it shall never be a sin to kill another human. That is NOT the deciding point on whether I kill or not. Even if in self-defense, I would be the murderer. Not the one I killed. That is the Christinsane Law you Religitards hold being an Absolute Law from your imagination.

For me, killing another human is NOT a sin. Rather, it is just WRONG. If another human attacks intending to kill me, you can rest assured I will kill that human first, if able. THAT is what I learned in the military. War is like survival. Kill. Or, be killed. That ain’t no law. That ain’t no sin. For even in this supposed civilized society us Humans have built, it is still a war of Kill, or be killed. Might could say, Die, or make dead.

Here is an idea for you. Make this response available to your Carmites. If agree, I SHALL clean-up the word usage, and delete any reference to this being a response through Email. What thinkest thou?

Looking forward to any response. Take as long as needed. If I never hear back. Oh, well... Things like that have never bothered me, except when I get hurt doing the limited amount of yard work I can do. Have you ever tried doing yard work from a wheel chair? And THAT is the difference between Religitards and Realists. Realists will still work, regardless. Religitards flee from work.

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved

Glossary

#

867-5309

A telephone number so popularized by a pop song, it was actually deleted from all phone systems so no person would receive that as their phone number. Cannot remember actual name of song, but in the 80s, and had that as Jenny’s number in the lyrics. 40y later, someone probably has that phone number.

A

AiseArcher

An AI search engine I built. If you notice, AiseArcher spells AI searcher. Just CamelCased correctly. In American English, it would be pronounced “ace archer” (1st vowel long, 2nd silent). In British English, it would be pronounced “ice archer” (1st vowel silent, 2nd long). In fact, in most European languages, with a double-vowel, the first vowel is the silent one with the second one pronounced long. Thus, Tolkien is pronounced tol•keen. NOT tol•kuhn as dumb arsed Americans pronounce it.

B

C

D

E

Emapthic Predation

A form of psychological warfare that preys exclusively and domineeringly upon the emotions of others overriding and blocking the intellect.

F

FACT

Formal Accurately Codified Truth.

FoR

Frame-of-Reference. There is no such thing as an absolute FoR. All FoRs are relative to all other FoRs.

G

H

Humanism

The only possible “religion” a True Scientist would ever claim. Prioritizes “human” and the Natural World above all else. Religious considerations are utterly disregarded and dismissed.

I

igNORant

Method of spelling to emphasize the “to actively ignore and disregard” pronunciation of this definition. Also includes “igNORance”.

igNURunt

Method of spelling to emphasize the “to be without knowledge” pronunciation of this definition. Also includes “igNURunce”.

J

K

L

M

N

Neander

shortened version of Homo neanderthalensis

O

OHEEF

Objective Hard Empirical Evidence and FACTs. If you ain’t got this, you are lying.

P

PoV

Point-of-View. Every person has one. No two are alike. Agreement with many on one PoV does not make a worldview.

Q

R

ROFLMAOWF

Rolling On Floor Laughing Me Arse Off With Fervor. Did you guess the WF?

Religitard

A term developed from the entire term “religious mental retardation”, for belief in any religion IS a mental retardation/disorder.

Religitardism

Also, Inexorable beLIEver. Any inexorable beLIEf in lies as truth. Specifically religion.

S

Sapien

shortened version of Homo sapiens

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

other

— The Unknown Atheist

Copyright © 2024 by RMFR. Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 International. All Other Rights Reserved